From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / clock_ops: allow to specify custom pm_clk_notifier callback
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:04:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5419B122.3010509@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUJzXNep14ny24R=FhA4WzsWU9401ZU-nnZ_CkkJqxSsA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On 09/17/2014 06:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Grygorii Strashko
> <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
>>> Since you're essentially gutting clock_ops, have you considered
>>> migrating to genpd and having your own pm_domain ops that manage your clocks?
>>
>> Yes. I've thought about using genpd. But:
>> - PM domain is not merged in 3.17 and I don't know if it will be merged in 3.18 :(
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg357003.html
>
> Let's wait and see...
>
>> - To switch using PM domains I will need to create PM domain node PER EACH device,
>> (if I understand PM domain bindings right). For example:
>>
>> +power_netcp: power-controller@0 {
>> + compatible = "keystone,power-controller";
>> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
>> + clocks = <&clkcpgmac>, <&clkpa>, <&chipclk12>;
>> + };
>>
>> netcp: netcp@2090000 {
>> reg = <0x2620110 0x8>;
>> + power-domains = <&power_netcp>;
>> ...
>> }
>
> I think you can have one power-controller, and add the clocks and
> power-domains properties to the individual device nodes.
>
> Then the power-controller driver can use the attach callback
> introduced in "[PATCH/RFC v2 04/12] PM / Domains: Add genpd attach/detach
> callbacks" (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/16/429) to set up the clocks?
Thanks for the advice. I saw your series :)
Unfortunately, I think, It can't be used as is, because there still no way
to separate "functional" and "optional" clocks for the device in DT.
So, I'll need to define some sort of "fck-clocks" or "pm-clocks" properties for each device -
but, it seems to be mostly impossible to obtain the approval of such a decision :(
(taking into account current state of discussion
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/12/441).
There no such problems with Gen PD, but, as drawback:
- I have to define one Gen PD per-device.
- some CLK data duplication is present if Driver code need
to operate with clocks in legacy way (for example to get current
CLK frequency).
Actually, I've done RFC implementation already and I hope to post it soon.
My DT looks like:
+ netcp_domain: netcp_pm_controller {
+ compatible = "ti,keystone-pm-controller";
+ clocks = <&clkpa>, <&clkcpgmac>, <&chipclk12>;
+ #power-domain-cells = <0>;
+ };
+
netcp: netcp@2090000 {
reg = <0x2620110 0x8>;
reg-names = "efuse";
@@ -229,6 +252,7 @@
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges;
+ power-domains = <&netcp_domain>;
clocks = <&clkpa>, <&clkcpgmac>, <&chipclk12>;
dma-coherent;
By the way, looks like you did the same thing as I:
I've hacked cock_ops, You - Generic PD ;P
but the goal is the same - add hooks for platform's specific initialization code
to workaround imperfection of clock_ops framework :)
regards,
-grygorii
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-17 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-25 18:31 [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / clock_ops: allow to specify custom pm_clk_notifier callback Grygorii Strashko
2014-07-25 18:31 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] PM / clock_ops: Add pm_clk_add_clk() Grygorii Strashko
2014-07-25 18:31 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] PM / clock_ops: allow to specify custom pm_clk_notifier callback Grygorii Strashko
2014-07-25 18:31 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ARM: keystone: pm_domain: setup clk pm domain clocks from DT Grygorii Strashko
2014-09-08 20:47 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-09-08 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / clock_ops: allow to specify custom pm_clk_notifier callback Kevin Hilman
2014-09-09 13:41 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-09-10 12:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-09-17 15:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-09-17 16:04 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5419B122.3010509@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox