From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756617AbaIQTa6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:30:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15564 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756006AbaIQTaz (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:30:55 -0400 Message-ID: <5419E122.9060404@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:29:38 -0400 From: Jon Masters Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Garrett , "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Hanjun Guo , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , Olof Johansson , Grant Likely , Will Deacon , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Liviu Dudau , Lv Zheng , Rob Herring , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Daniel Lezcano , Robert Moore , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com, Robert Richter , Jason Cooper , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Mark Brown , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Graeme Gregory , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 References: <1410530416-30200-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1410530416-30200-19-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20140917014410.GC31214@srcf.ucam.org> <4416582.iOjLNrLDZE@vostro.rjw.lan> <20140917192259.GA18980@srcf.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20140917192259.GA18980@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/17/2014 03:22 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:37:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> There are no implied IP issues with using the information there I know of and >> if there's any fine print anywhere that may suggest so, please let me know. > > Using the information should be fine, but my understanding of the UEFI > forum rules is that any submissions to UEFI specs must be from UEFI > forum members - there are concerns around accidentally including > patented material. The easy way around this is just for the bindings to > be managed outside UEFI. I've raised this with Dong in person this morning and I'll ask him to followup on UEFI policy. Jon.