From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: blk-mq timeout handling fixes
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:56:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <541A03A1.9070908@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402958C86C8E@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On 09/17/2014 03:53 PM, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@lst.de]
>> Sent: Saturday, 13 September, 2014 6:40 PM
>> To: Jens Axboe
>> Cc: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage); linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: blk-mq timeout handling fixes
>>
>> This series fixes various issues with timeout handling that Robert
>> ran into when testing scsi-mq heavily. He tested an earlier version,
>> and couldn't reproduce the issues anymore, although the series changed
>> quite significantly since and should probably be retested.
>>
>> In summary we not only start the blk-mq timer inside the drivers
>> ->queue_rq method after the request has been fully setup, and we
>> also tell the drivers if we're timing out a reserved (internal)
>> request or a real one. Many drivers including will need to handle
>> those internal ones differently, e.g. for scsi-mq we don't even
>> have a scsi command structure allocated for the reserved commands.
>
> I have rerun a variety of tests on:
> * Jens' for-next tree that went into 3.17rc5
> * plus this series
> * plus two patches for infinite recursion on flushes from
> Ming and then Christoph
This is pretty much what is queued up for 3.17 as well. It's bigger than
I'd like at this point, but these are real fixes.
> and have not been able to trigger the scsi_times_out req->special
> NULL pointer dereference that prompted this series.
Great!!
> Testing includes:
> * concurrent heavy workload generators:
> * fio high iodepth direct 512 byte random reads (> 1M IOPS)
> * programs generating large bursts of paged writes
> * mkfs.ext4 (followed by e2fsck)
> * mkfs.xfs (followed by xfs_check)
> * ddpt
> * watch -n 0 sync to generate flushes
> * scsi_logging_level MLCOMPLETE set to 0 or 1
> * scsi_lib.c patched to put all the ACTION_FAIL messages
> under level 1 so they can be squelched (massive error
> prints cause more timeouts themselves)
> * 4 hpsa and 16 mpt3sas devices (all made from SAS SSDs)
> * lockless hpsa driver
> * injecting errors
> * device removal
> * device generating infinite errors
> * device generating a brief number of errors
>
> The filesystems don't always recover properly, but nothing in
> the block or scsi midlayers crashed.
>
> So, you may add this to the series:
> Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
Thanks a lot for your (continued) testing, Robert. It's a great help.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-17 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-13 23:40 blk-mq timeout handling fixes Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-13 23:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_END Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-13 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: call blk_mq_start_request from ->queue_rq Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-15 6:34 ` Ming Lei
2014-09-15 7:27 ` Ming Lei
2014-09-13 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_end_io to blk_mq_end_request Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-13 23:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-mq: fix and simplify tag iteration for the timeout handler Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-13 23:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-mq: unshared " Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-13 23:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: pass a reserved argument to the " Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-17 21:53 ` blk-mq timeout handling fixes Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-09-17 21:56 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=541A03A1.9070908@fb.com \
--to=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=Elliott@hp.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox