From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: ssbi: promote the driver to subsys level
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:34:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <541A0C69.1030402@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140917222519.GV30918@lee--X1>
On 17/09/14 23:25, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>
>>> On 17 Sep 2014 09:03, "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This patch promtes the driver to be at subsystem level as this driver
>>>>> will be used by gpio controller drivers which inturn are used by many
>>>>> platform drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Any reason why you're not using -EPROBE?
>>>>
>>> EPROBE is possible but it's going to add few more cycles to boot time.
>>>
>>> As this driver is a very basic driver on which other drivers depend
>>> ensuring the sequence would improve the boot time.
>>
>> We only tend to promote drivers' init level as a last resort. If
>> -EPROBE_DEFER is possible, please use that instead.
>
> To conclude for any casual/interested observers; I'd be willing to
> accept the patch if you can provide some metrics that prove boot-time
> is sufficiently increased as a result of using -EPROBE_DEFER.
That's fair enough I will get the details..
>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/mfd/ssbi.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ssbi.c b/drivers/mfd/ssbi.c
>>>>> index b78942e..4fbe02e 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/ssbi.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ssbi.c
>>>>> @@ -331,7 +331,12 @@ static struct platform_driver ssbi_driver = {
>>>>> .of_match_table = ssbi_match_table,
>>>>> },
>>>>> };
>>>>> -module_platform_driver(ssbi_driver);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int ssbi_init(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return platform_driver_register(&ssbi_driver);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +subsys_initcall(ssbi_init);
>
> Also, as a nasty side-effect of this patch, this module will no longer
> be unloadable, which is probably not what you want.
>
>>>>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>>>> MODULE_VERSION("1.0");
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-17 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-17 0:59 [PATCH] mfd: ssbi: promote the driver to subsys level Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-09-17 16:03 ` Lee Jones
[not found] ` <CAGkH4DOPHQWBVZgiLZugcoTZNJiS-ar8KNvq96W5UmX8C6GCTg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-09-17 16:49 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-17 22:25 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-17 22:34 ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=541A0C69.1030402@linaro.org \
--to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox