From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753398AbaIWGOt (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:14:49 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:42297 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751578AbaIWGOs (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:14:48 -0400 Message-ID: <54210FD3.5000906@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:14:43 +0800 From: Zefan Li User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guenter Roeck CC: Zefan Li , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/45] 3.4.104-rc1 review References: <1411439259-30224-1-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org> <5420FDFB.8040203@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <5420FDFB.8040203@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.18.230] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2014/9/23 12:58, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 09/22/2014 07:27 PM, Zefan Li wrote: >> From: Zefan Li >> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.104 release. >> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Thu Sep 25 02:03:31 UTC 2014. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> > > Build results: > total: 119 pass: 116 fail: 3 > Failed builds: > score:defconfig > sparc64:allmodconfig > xtensa:allmodconfig > > Qemu test results: > total: 18 pass: 17 fail: 1 > Failed tests: > arm:arm_versatile_defconfig > > This is an improvement over the previous release, where we had six build > failures. Thanks for digging out the fixes to those build failures. > The failing qemu test is a recent addition which is expected > to fail for the 3.4 kernel. The failure is due to Versatile SCSI driver > and interrupt handling problems; those were fixed in later kernels but > would be difficult to back-port. > Thanks for testing! This is my first time doing stable release, and luckily I haven't broken the build or boot. :)