From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"juri.lelli@gmail.com" <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
"raistlin@linux.it" <raistlin@linux.it>,
"michael@amarulasolutions.com" <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
"fchecconi@gmail.com" <fchecconi@gmail.com>,
"daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de" <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>,
"vincent@legout.info" <vincent@legout.info>,
"luca.abeni@unitn.it" <luca.abeni@unitn.it>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/deadline: fix bandwidth check/update when migrating tasks between exclusive cpusets
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:12:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54212B85.7060806@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140919212547.GG2832@worktop.localdomain>
Hi Peter,
On 19/09/14 22:25, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:22:40AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> Exclusive cpusets are the only way users can restrict SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
>> affinity (performing what is commonly called clustered scheduling).
>> Unfortunately, such thing is currently broken for two reasons:
>>
>> - No check is performed when the user tries to attach a task to
>> an exlusive cpuset (recall that exclusive cpusets have an
>> associated maximum allowed bandwidth).
>>
>> - Bandwidths of source and destination cpusets are not correctly
>> updated after a task is migrated between them.
>>
>> This patch fixes both things at once, as they are opposite faces
>> of the same coin.
>>
>> The check is performed in cpuset_can_attach(), as there aren't any
>> points of failure after that function. The updated is split in two
>> halves. We first reserve bandwidth in the destination cpuset, after
>> we pass the check in cpuset_can_attach(). And we then release
>> bandwidth from the source cpuset when the task's affinity is
>> actually changed. Even if there can be time windows when sched_setattr()
>> may erroneously fail in the source cpuset, we are fine with it, as
>> we can't perfom an atomic update of both cpusets at once.
>
> The thing I cannot find is if we correctly deal with updates to the
> cpuset. Say we first setup 2 (exclusive) sets A:cpu0 B:cpu1-3. Then
> assign tasks and then update the cpu masks like: B:cpu2,3, A:cpu1,2.
>
Right, next week I should be able to properly test this.
Thanks a lot,
- Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-19 9:22 [PATCH 0/3] SCHED_DEADLINE fix AC and SMP scheduling Juri Lelli
2014-09-19 9:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/deadline: clear dl_entity params when setscheduling to different class Juri Lelli
2014-09-19 11:44 ` Daniel Wagner
2014-09-19 12:43 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-22 18:50 ` Vincent Legout
2014-09-24 14:54 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Clear " tip-bot for Juri Lelli
2014-10-08 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/deadline: clear " Wanpeng Li
2014-10-21 12:15 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-21 13:15 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-19 9:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/deadline: fix bandwidth check/update when migrating tasks between exclusive cpusets Juri Lelli
2014-09-19 11:47 ` Daniel Wagner
2014-09-19 12:46 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-19 21:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-23 8:12 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2014-10-07 8:59 ` Juri Lelli
2014-10-07 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-07 13:12 ` Juri Lelli
2014-10-28 11:07 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Ensure that updates to exclusive cpusets don't break AC tip-bot for Juri Lelli
2014-09-22 19:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/deadline: fix bandwidth check/update when migrating tasks between exclusive cpusets Vincent Legout
2014-09-23 8:09 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-23 13:08 ` Daniel Wagner
2014-10-28 11:07 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Fix bandwidth check/ update " tip-bot for Juri Lelli
2014-09-19 9:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched/deadline: fix inter- exclusive cpusets migrations Juri Lelli
2014-09-24 14:55 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Fix " tip-bot for Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54212B85.7060806@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=vincent@legout.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).