From: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
To: hch@infradead.org
Cc: bruce.lucas@mongodb.com, adam.radford@avagotech.com,
kashyap.desai@avagotech.com,
Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com>,
Praveen Krishnamoorthy <praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com>,
Abhijit Mahajan <abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com>,
MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mptfusion: enable no_write_same for vmware scsi disks
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:11:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5421F020.1030309@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411482160-32007-1-git-send-email-chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
On 09/23/2014 09:22 AM, Chris J Arges wrote:
> When using a virtual SCSI disk in a VMWare VM if blkdev_issue_zeroout is used
> data can be improperly zeroed out using the mptfusion driver. This patch
> disables write_same for this driver and the vmware subsystem_vendor which
> ensures that manual zeroing out is used instead.
>
> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591
> Reported-by: Bruce Lucas <bruce.lucas@mongodb.com>
> Tested-by: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c
> index 787933d..613231c 100644
> --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c
> @@ -1419,6 +1419,11 @@ mptspi_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> goto out_mptspi_probe;
> }
>
> + /* VMWare emulation doesn't properly implement WRITE_SAME
> + */
> + if (pdev->subsystem_vendor == 0x15AD)
> + sh->no_write_same = 1;
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ioc->FreeQlock, flags);
>
> /* Attach the SCSI Host to the IOC structure
>
As a workaround one can do the following:
# Set the scsi disk max_write_same_blocks to 0 to disable write_same.
(Your paths may vary...)
echo 0 >
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:10.0/host32/target32:0:0/32:0:0:0/scsi_disk/32:0:0:0/max_write_same_blocks
# Force the dm device to reload (thus calling dm_table_set_restrictions
and checking for the new max_write_same_blocks value)
dmsetup table /dev/dm-0 save
dmsetup suspend /dev/dm-0; dmsetup reload /dev/dm-0 save; dmsetup resume
/dev/dm-0
# Now the dm device shows write_same_max_bytes as 0
cat /sys/block/dm-0/queue/write_same_max_bytes
# Run the test case in the original bug, it now passes.
So a few questions:
1) Does this workaround make sense? Perhaps there is an easier way?
2) Do we expect changing max_write_same_blocks at the scsi_disk level to
propagate the right write_same flags to other layers such as dm?
3) In light of this workaround, does this patch still make sense? Would
there be a better layer to fix this?
Thanks,
--chris j arges
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-22 17:56 [PATCH] mptfusion: enable no_write_same in scsi_host_template Chris J Arges
2014-09-22 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-22 18:17 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-22 18:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-22 18:50 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-22 20:44 ` [PATCH v2] mptfusion: enable no_write_same for vmware scsi disks Chris J Arges
2014-09-22 20:54 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-23 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-23 14:22 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris J Arges
2014-09-23 15:29 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-23 22:11 ` Chris J Arges [this message]
2014-09-23 23:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-09-24 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-24 15:11 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-09-25 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5421F020.1030309@canonical.com \
--to=chris.j.arges@canonical.com \
--cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com \
--cc=abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com \
--cc=adam.radford@avagotech.com \
--cc=bruce.lucas@mongodb.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kashyap.desai@avagotech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com \
--cc=praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com \
--cc=sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).