From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752349AbaIXHXb (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 03:23:31 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:29176 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717AbaIXHX3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 03:23:29 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,587,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="607666006" Message-ID: <54227166.7010901@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:23:18 +0800 From: Jiang Liu Organization: Intel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas , Randy Dunlap , Yinghai Lu , Borislav Petkov , Grant Likely , Marc Zyngier CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Andrew Morton , Tony Luck , Joerg Roedel , Greg Kroah-Hartman , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC Part2 v1 01/21] irqdomain: Introduce new interfaces to support hierarchy irqdomains References: <1410444228-3134-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <1410444228-3134-2-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <54226AE1.4000603@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <54226AE1.4000603@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2014/9/24 14:55, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > (2014/09/11 23:03), Jiang Liu wrote: >> +static void irq_domain_free_irq_data(unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + struct irq_data *irq_data, *tmp; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) { > >> + irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq + i); >> + tmp = irq_data->parent_data; > > Why don't you care NULL condition? Yeah, there's an explicitly assumption that, irq_get_irq_data() always return valid pointer once we have allocated the irq number and associated irq_desc. If preferred, I will add a check here. > >> + irq_data->parent_data = NULL; >> + irq_data->domain = NULL; >> + >> + while (tmp) { >> + irq_data = tmp; >> + tmp = tmp->parent_data; >> + kfree(irq_data); >> + } >> + } >> +} >> + >> +static int irq_domain_alloc_irq_data(struct irq_domain *domain, >> + unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + struct irq_data *irq_data; >> + struct irq_domain *parent; >> + >> + /* The outmost irq_data is embedded in struct irq_desc */ >> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) { > > >> + irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq + i); >> + irq_data->domain = domain; > > ditto. Seems as above. Regards! Gerry > > Thanks, > Yasuaki Ishimatsu >