From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753991AbaIXSeH (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:34:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:40165 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752240AbaIXSeE (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:34:04 -0400 Message-ID: <54230E9A.7020109@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:34:02 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: qcom: Update SoC compatibles we support References: <1411582838-24159-1-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <1411582838-24159-1-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/24/14 11:20, Kumar Gala wrote: > Move to just using the SoC name in the compatible list so we don't need > to update this for every board going forward. Also added "qcom,msm8974" > to the list as we support "qcom,apq8074" already (the modemless version > of "qcom,msm8974"). > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- Or just remove the file entirely. Things work without having to add anything here anyway. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation