From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752914AbaIYDUh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:20:37 -0400
Received: from mail7.hitachi.co.jp ([133.145.228.42]:49910 "EHLO
	mail7.hitachi.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751351AbaIYDUf (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:20:35 -0400
Message-ID: <542389FB.7010109@hitachi.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:20:27 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Organization: Hitachi, Ltd., Japan
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftracetest: Add a couple of ftrace test cases
References: <20140923173846.603cb49c@gandalf.local.home> <5422336A.6030304@hitachi.com> <20140924114235.4287f4a1@gandalf.local.home> <20140924115811.6eeeab8c@gandalf.local.home> <54236339.7060506@hitachi.com> <20140924211440.2c170de4@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20140924211440.2c170de4@gandalf.local.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

(2014/09/25 10:14), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:35:05 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> wrote:
> 
>> (2014/09/25 0:58), Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:42:35 -0400
>>> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I think you'd better use exit_unsupported/exit_xfail to notify
>>>>> that the test target is not configured, or expected to fail.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are these functions defined anywhere? I don't seem them in your v5
>>> patch set, or in selftests anywhere.
>>
>> Hmm, could you check my 4/4 patch in the series??
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg730578.html
> 
> Hmm, I somehow missed this. Can you check to make sure my for-next
> patches are your latest version. I'll pull in 4/4 tomorrow.

Yeah, I ensured that your for-next patches are the v5. You will be
able to cleanly apply 4/4 on it :)

Thank you,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- Steve
> 


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com