From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752912AbaIYIoo (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 04:44:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:57691 "EHLO mail-pd0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752738AbaIYIod (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 04:44:33 -0400 Message-ID: <5423D5E8.1050008@samsung.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:44:24 +0900 From: Kukjin Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomasz Figa CC: Kukjin Kim , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "'Thomas Abraham'" , "'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz'" , daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "'Marek Szyprowski'" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs References: <5230569.XLlNbB5NvF@amdc1032> <018e01cfd885$770dd940$65298bc0$@kernel.org> <20140925081704.GA20841@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <5423D19B.1040203@samsung.com> <5423D23C.5010204@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5423D23C.5010204@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/25/14 17:28, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Kukjin, > > On 25.09.2014 10:26, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> On 09/25/14 17:17, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >>> [CC'ed Daniel to make him aware this patch goes through your tree] >>> >> Thanks and just note the branch which is including this change actually >> v4 is just rebased not v3 will be sent out to arm-soc last tonight or >> tomorrow. v3 is correct :) sorry, I confused the version... > > Could you keep this patch in a separate stable branch, so I could pull > it as a dependency for Thomas Abraham's cpufreq series? > It's possible, but would be better that DT changes are sent to upstream through samsung/arm-soc tree?...we suffered ugly conflicts between arm-soc and driver before and then we decided DT changes should be handled in arm-soc...Hmm... - Kukjin