From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752482AbaIYMY0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:24:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:55402 "EHLO mail-wg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751414AbaIYMYY (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:24:24 -0400 Message-ID: <54240976.5080605@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 14:24:22 +0200 From: Daniel Lezcano User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lorenzo Pieralisi CC: Kukjin Kim , "'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz'" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "'Marek Szyprowski'" , "'Tomasz Figa'" , Mark Rutland , "'Thomas Abraham'" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs References: <5230569.XLlNbB5NvF@amdc1032> <018e01cfd885$770dd940$65298bc0$@kernel.org> <20140925081704.GA20841@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <5423DA0D.9030100@linaro.org> <20140925093605.GA23853@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140925093605.GA23853@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/25/2014 11:36 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 09/25/2014 10:17 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >>> [CC'ed Daniel to make him aware this patch goes through your tree] >> >> Thanks for the head up. I was about to send the PR to Rafael. >> >> [ ... ] >> >>> That's great, now my Exynos CPUidle DT patch should be rebased on top >>> of this patch so that thanks to the testing carried out by Bart it can be >>> merged too. >> >> Ok, I am getting confused. How can I rebase the latest patch of your >> series with a patch no yet available in my tree ? > > I just wanted to say that the Exynos CPUidle DT patch depends on this > patch, that is now going through Samsung tree, to make sure we are on > the same page and prevent issues, it was not clear, sorry. Ah, ok. >> I propose just to drop the last patch and wait for the next merge to >> reintegrate it into the cpuidle tree. Does it make sense ? > > I agree, drop the Exynos CPUidle DT patch, we will reintegrate it in the > CPUidle tree when the merge window closes and dependencies are sorted out. Perfect. I sent the PR to Rafael. Thanks -- Daniel -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog