From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932481AbaJHNuX (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:50:23 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:50752 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754944AbaJHNuV (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:50:21 -0400 Message-ID: <5435410C.4040005@pivasoftware.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:50:04 +0100 From: Oussama Ghorbel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH , Roger Quadros CC: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Rabin Vincent , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] phy: omap-usb2: Enable runtime PM of omap-usb2 phy properly References: <20141006194418.GA399@debian> <1412679771-8293-1-git-send-email-ghorbel@pivasoftware.com> <5434F336.4040908@ti.com> <543517F9.9070109@pivasoftware.com> <54352340.3050900@ti.com> <20141008132615.GA5119@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20141008132615.GA5119@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:bUc8lm6EuS7ly/2abQEiqC6bKAR94w7/xwULaygQHJ4 0iDpa67+3/tV/DQ8+k6zaBVYg6S0Zap6ucetN/vuhCG7maZRak /t6RK7w+Fudqxgn6Uu7sOggahgd5lB7tGR0pqpQoqlMc1Ldsj3 oWc24RQJhJlBow5SNGNCBxStxobGO2otx9S59D/xX3bH3RsFMO Ag7mkJhpjE75bIS/r1Zgi8cyv/lOyNaVPhjAzJQqw5CJnLBM2w 5hYdKHI4j8w3OUVfmQDdkDK9oquAsY8HbovBLGTDjpjJL4erdu nmByGwzKKhjBK3Mj4TO7Gqqf6vOgClTyU5hCP0UdKPsXVRhnJe X0cdHsBD8u2BkFaTkP2ZgBXeqLqZbxaV7TtVupaY/ X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nothing to send then. Oussama On 10/08/2014 02:26 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:42:56PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >> Oussama, >> >> On 10/08/2014 01:54 PM, Oussama Ghorbel wrote: >>> Hi Roger, >>> >>> Should I resend this v2 version of the patch to stable@vger.kernel.org which is suitable for v3.17 and which will require a very tiny adaptation? >>> Or I should resend the first version of this patch which is suitable for 3.16 but might seems confusing a little sine I'm resend the outdated version. >> If it is a trivial conflict then I think you can just send the patch >> which applies to the most recent kernel. >> Greg can clarify if I'm wrong as he maintains the stable trees. > Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to submit > patches to the stable trees. Note, it has to be in Linus's tree _first_ > before you ever worry about the stable trees. Do that first please. > > thanks, > > greg k-h