From: Weng Meiling <wengmeiling.weng@huawei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
<tj@kernel.org>
Cc: <tt.rantala@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Huang Qiang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>,
"Li Zefan" <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/group.c:65!
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:43:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54368308.90202@huawei.com> (raw)
Hi guys,
I see the mails you discussed the BUG at fs/sysfs/group.c:65! triggered by duplicated sysfs link.
the detail mail:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/8/370
but it seems the problems has no conclusion. In our environment, we triggered the bug too, but for error ENOENT:
we use 3.4 kernel, and do virtual disk device create / remove for many times. Before remove we can see the devices:
#ll /sys/devices/virtual/block/
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 0 Oct 6 09:17 sd-1a
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 0 Oct 6 09:17 sd-2a
when the two virtual devices were removed, the directory block/ was delete too.
after many times create / remove, the kernel trigger the bug (just the main call trace):
[ 3965.441713] WARNING: at /usr/src/packages/BUILD/linux-3.4/lib/kobject.c:202 kobject_add_internal+0x11f/0x280()
[ 3965.441716] Hardware name: Romley
[ 3965.441718] kobject_add_internal failed for sd-1a (error: -2 parent: block)
[ 3965.441817] Call Trace:
[ 3965.441820] [<ffffffff8103717a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
[ 3965.441823] [<ffffffff81037251>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50
[ 3965.441826] [<ffffffff81215e0f>] kobject_add_internal+0x11f/0x280
[ 3965.441830] [<ffffffff81216267>] kobject_add+0x67/0xc0
[ 3965.441833] [<ffffffff812d2305>] device_add+0x105/0x6d0
[ 3965.441836] [<ffffffff812d0dbc>] ? dev_set_name+0x3c/0x40
[ 3965.441839] [<ffffffff812030ac>] add_disk+0x1bc/0x490
[ 3965.441912] kernel BUG at /usr/src/packages/BUILD/linux-3.4/fs/sysfs/group.c:65!
[ 3965.441915] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 3965.686738] Call Trace:
[ 3965.686743] [<ffffffff811a677e>] sysfs_create_group+0xe/0x10
[ 3965.686748] [<ffffffff810cfb04>] blk_trace_init_sysfs+0x14/0x20
[ 3965.686753] [<ffffffff811fcabb>] blk_register_queue+0x3b/0x120
[ 3965.686756] [<ffffffff812030bc>] add_disk+0x1cc/0x490
from the error "kobject_add_internal failed for sd-1a (error: -2 parent: block)", we found that the first
warning was caused by the disk device's parent_sd was null when it was added into sysfs:
int sysfs_create_dir(struct kobject * kobj)
{
...
if (kobj->parent)
parent_sd = kobj->parent->sd;
else
parent_sd = &sysfs_root;
if (!parent_sd)
return -ENOENT;
...
}
The virtual disk device was not added into sysfs because of the above failure, and the kobj->sd was
not set, then trigger the bug when creating attribute group under the device's directory:
static int internal_create_group(struct kobject *kobj, int update,
const struct attribute_group *grp)
{
...
BUG_ON(!kobj || (!update && !kobj->sd));
...
}
Walk the code, it seems there maybe a race between block/ remove and virtual disk devices' register:
when the two virtual devices were removed, the block/ directory's refcount became 0, will into:
path0(remove the block/) path1(register virtual device sd-1a)
kobject_del(){ get_device_parent(){
... ...
sysfs_remove_dir(kobj); //kobj->sd=0 spin_lock(&dev->class->p->glue_dirs.list_lock);
... <========= list_for_each_entry(k, &dev->class->p->glue_dirs.list, entry) //get parent kobject from kset list
kobj_kset_leave(kobj); //remove kobj from kset list ...
} }
If getting parent object between " kobj->sd=0 " and "remove_kset_leave(kobj)", the sysfs_create_dir() will return ENOENT and trigger the BUG later.
The lastest kernel seems to be the same. But I am not familiar with block device, I am not sure whether the analysis is right or I am missing something.
what do you think about this situation? Any suggestion is appreciative. Thanks!
next reply other threads:[~2014-10-09 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-09 12:43 Weng Meiling [this message]
2014-10-09 12:47 ` kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/group.c:65! Weng Meiling
2014-10-11 3:00 ` Weng Meiling
2014-10-13 6:45 ` kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/group.c:65! (CC Jens ) Weng Meiling
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-08 19:35 kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/group.c:65! Tommi Rantala
2013-03-08 20:41 ` Greg KH
2013-03-08 21:15 ` Tommi Rantala
2013-03-09 13:48 ` Ming Lei
2013-03-09 16:36 ` Tommi Rantala
2013-03-10 8:53 ` Ming Lei
2013-03-10 11:50 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-10 16:41 ` Greg KH
2013-03-10 20:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-03-10 21:40 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54368308.90202@huawei.com \
--to=wengmeiling.weng@huawei.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=h.huangqiang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=tt.rantala@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).