From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: copy bi_vcnt in __bio_clone_fast
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:26:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54369B13.4030004@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x4938axz6vd.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/9/14, 9:53 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes:
>
>> Commit 05f1dd53152173 (block: add queue flag for disabling SG
>> merging) uses bi_vcnt to assign bio->bi_phys_segments if sg
>> merging is disabled. When using device mapper on top of a blk-mq
>> device (virtio_blk in my test), we'd end up overflowing the
>> scatterlist in __blk_bios_map_sg.
>>
>> __bio_clone_fast copies bi_iter and bi_io_vec but not bi_vcnt,
>> so blk_recount_segments would report bi_phys_segments as 0.
>> Since rq->nr_phys_segments is 0 as well, the checks to ensure
>> that we don't exceed the queue's segment limit end up allowing
>> more bios (and segments) to attach the a request until we finally
>> map it. That also means we pass the BUG_ON at the beginning of
>> virtio_queue_rq, ultimately causing memory corruption and a
>> crash.
>>
>> If we copy bi_vcnt in __bio_clone_fast, the bios and requests
>> properly report the number of segments and everything works as
>> expected.
>>
>> Originally reported at
>> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=888259
>
> Hi, Jeff,
>
> Did you manage to reproduce this problem with commit 0738854
> (blk-merge: fix blk_recount_segments) applied? Or perhaps with
> commit 200612e (dm table: propagate QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE)?
Yep. I was able to reproduce it with 3.17. I did try 0738854 when I
was still using 3.16 since it looked like a good candidate. Neither of
those patches affect the problem here. bio->bi_phys_segments never
gets a value set in the fast clone case and that translates to
req->nr_phys_segments never getting properly accumulated. That might
not be a problem except that the NO_SG_MERGE behavior bypasses the
iteration that would come up with the correct value. In either case,
it's still correct to copy bi_vcnt from the source bio since it's
describing the same bvec. Doing the iteration with no merging would
just end up with the same value. bio_clone_bioset builds up bi_vcnt as
it iterates over the number of segments, so that works fine. It's only
__bio_clone_fast that's broken.
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)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=bziR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-09 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-08 22:54 [PATCH] block: copy bi_vcnt in __bio_clone_fast Jeff Mahoney
2014-10-09 13:53 ` Jeff Moyer
2014-10-09 14:26 ` Jeff Mahoney [this message]
2014-10-09 15:25 ` Ming Lei
2014-10-09 16:13 ` Ming Lei
2014-10-09 17:58 ` Jeff Mahoney
2014-10-09 19:12 ` Jens Axboe
2014-10-10 1:24 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54369B13.4030004@suse.com \
--to=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox