linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matteo Franchin <Matteo.Franchin@arm.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Ensure get_futex_key_refs() always implies a barrier
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 14:32:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5442C045.2040909@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413563929-2664-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On 10/17/14 11:38, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Commit b0c29f79ecea (futexes: Avoid taking the hb->lock if there's
> nothing to wake up) changes the futex code to avoid taking a lock when
> there are no waiters. This code has been subsequently fixed in commit
> 11d4616bd07f (futex: revert back to the explicit waiter counting code).
> Both the original commit and the fix-up rely on get_futex_key_refs() to
> always imply a barrier.
> 
> However, for private futexes, none of the cases in the switch statement
> of get_futex_key_refs() would be hit and the function completes without
> a memory barrier as required before checking the "waiters" in
> futex_wake() -> hb_waiters_pending(). The consequence is a race with a
> thread waiting on a futex on another CPU, allowing the waker thread to
> read "waiters == 0" while the waiter thread to have read "futex_val ==
> locked" (in kernel).


Verified that this is:

a) how it is documented to work
b) not how it actually works currently

Nice catch indeed.

...

> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 815d7af2ffe8..f3a3a071283c 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ static void get_futex_key_refs(union futex_key *key)
>  	case FUT_OFF_MMSHARED:
>  		futex_get_mm(key); /* implies MB (B) */
>  		break;
> +	default:

A comment here indicating this covers the PROCESS_PRIVATE futex case
would be welcome, given the complexity involved.

> +		smp_mb(); /* explicit MB (B) */

Also, the "Basic" futex operation and ordering guarantees documentation
currently reads:

 * Where (A) orders the waiters increment and the futex value read through
 * atomic operations (see hb_waiters_inc) and where (B) orders the write
 * to futex and the waiters read -- this is done by the barriers in
 * get_futex_key_refs(), through either ihold or atomic_inc, depending
on the
 * futex type.

Which is not incomplete (lacking the explicit smp_mb()) added by this
patch. Perhaps the MB implementation of get_futex_key_refs() need not be
explicitly enumerated here?

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-18 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-17 16:38 [PATCH] futex: Ensure get_futex_key_refs() always implies a barrier Catalin Marinas
2014-10-18  6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-10-18  7:09   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-10-18 15:28   ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-18 16:15     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-10-18  7:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-18 19:58   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-18 20:50     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-19  2:16       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-20  9:11         ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-20 10:49           ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-20 15:32             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-20 16:00               ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-18 19:32 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2014-10-18 20:19   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-18 20:25     ` Darren Hart
2014-10-20 10:15     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-24  3:27 ` [PATCH] futex: Mention key referencing differences between shared and private futexes Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-24  9:11   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-26 15:22   ` [tip:locking/urgent] " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5442C045.2040909@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Matteo.Franchin@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).