From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kirill V Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/deadline: do not try to push tasks if pinned task switches to dl
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:11:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5446316B.4070707@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412989095-7507-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 11/10/14 01:58, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> As Kirill mentioned(https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/118):
> | If rq has already had 2 or more pushable tasks and we try to add a
> | pinned task then call of push_rt_task will just waste a time.
>
> Just switched pinned task is not able to be pushed. If the rq had had
^
has
> several dl tasks before they have already been considered as candidates
> to be pushed (or pulled). This patch done the same behavior as rt class
^
implements? aligns to...
> which introduced by commit 10447917551e ("sched/rt: Do not try to push
> tasks if pinned task switches to RT").
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> * use 12 or more chars for the git commit ID
>
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index abfaf3d..cf7c9b6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1603,7 +1603,8 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>
> if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - if (rq->dl.overloaded && push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))
> + if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && rq->dl.overloaded
> + && push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))
I'd personally align this && to p->nr_cpus_allowed, but that's just my
personal taste, though. :)
> /* Only reschedule if pushing failed */
> check_resched = 0;
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
Anyway, the change looks good, thanks!
Best,
- Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-21 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-11 0:58 [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/deadline: do not try to push tasks if pinned task switches to dl Wanpeng Li
2014-10-21 10:11 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2014-10-21 12:14 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5446316B.4070707@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox