public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/deadline: do not try to push tasks if pinned task switches to dl
@ 2014-10-11  0:58 Wanpeng Li
  2014-10-21 10:11 ` Juri Lelli
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wanpeng Li @ 2014-10-11  0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: Juri Lelli, Kirill V Tkhai, Steven Rostedt, linux-kernel,
	Wanpeng Li

As Kirill mentioned(https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/118):
| If rq has already had 2 or more pushable tasks and we try to add a 
| pinned task then call of push_rt_task will just waste a time.

Just switched pinned task is not able to be pushed. If the rq had had
several dl tasks before they have already been considered as candidates
to be pushed (or pulled). This patch done the same behavior as rt class 
which introduced by commit 10447917551e ("sched/rt: Do not try to push 
tasks if pinned task switches to RT"). 

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
 * use 12 or more chars for the git commit ID

 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index abfaf3d..cf7c9b6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1603,7 +1603,8 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 
 	if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-		if (rq->dl.overloaded && push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))
+		if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && rq->dl.overloaded
+				&& push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))
 			/* Only reschedule if pushing failed */
 			check_resched = 0;
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/deadline: do not try to push tasks if pinned task switches to dl
  2014-10-11  0:58 [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/deadline: do not try to push tasks if pinned task switches to dl Wanpeng Li
@ 2014-10-21 10:11 ` Juri Lelli
  2014-10-21 12:14   ` Wanpeng Li
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Juri Lelli @ 2014-10-21 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wanpeng Li, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: Kirill V Tkhai, Steven Rostedt, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On 11/10/14 01:58, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> As Kirill mentioned(https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/118):
> | If rq has already had 2 or more pushable tasks and we try to add a 
> | pinned task then call of push_rt_task will just waste a time.
> 
> Just switched pinned task is not able to be pushed. If the rq had had
                                                                 ^
                                                                has
> several dl tasks before they have already been considered as candidates
> to be pushed (or pulled). This patch done the same behavior as rt class
                                        ^
                                    implements? aligns to...

> which introduced by commit 10447917551e ("sched/rt: Do not try to push 
> tasks if pinned task switches to RT").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>  * use 12 or more chars for the git commit ID
> 
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index abfaf3d..cf7c9b6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1603,7 +1603,8 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  
>  	if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -		if (rq->dl.overloaded && push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))
> +		if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && rq->dl.overloaded
> +				&& push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))

I'd personally align this && to p->nr_cpus_allowed, but that's just my
personal taste, though. :)

>  			/* Only reschedule if pushing failed */
>  			check_resched = 0;
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> 

Anyway, the change looks good, thanks!

Best,

- Juri


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/deadline: do not try to push tasks if pinned task switches to dl
  2014-10-21 10:11 ` Juri Lelli
@ 2014-10-21 12:14   ` Wanpeng Li
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wanpeng Li @ 2014-10-21 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juri Lelli, Wanpeng Li, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: Kirill V Tkhai, Steven Rostedt, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


于 10/21/14, 6:11 PM, Juri Lelli 写道:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/10/14 01:58, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> As Kirill mentioned(https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/118):
>> | If rq has already had 2 or more pushable tasks and we try to add a
>> | pinned task then call of push_rt_task will just waste a time.
>>
>> Just switched pinned task is not able to be pushed. If the rq had had
>                                                                   ^
>                                                                  has
>> several dl tasks before they have already been considered as candidates
>> to be pushed (or pulled). This patch done the same behavior as rt class
>                                          ^
>                                      implements? aligns to...
>
>> which introduced by commit 10447917551e ("sched/rt: Do not try to push
>> tasks if pinned task switches to RT").
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2:
>>   * use 12 or more chars for the git commit ID
>>
>>   kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> index abfaf3d..cf7c9b6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> @@ -1603,7 +1603,8 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>>   
>>   	if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> -		if (rq->dl.overloaded && push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))
>> +		if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && rq->dl.overloaded
>> +				&& push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))
> I'd personally align this && to p->nr_cpus_allowed, but that's just my
> personal taste, though. :)

Ah, ok, I will send out a newer version tomorrow. ;-)

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

>
>>   			/* Only reschedule if pushing failed */
>>   			check_resched = 0;
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>>
> Anyway, the change looks good, thanks!
>
> Best,
>
> - Juri
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-21 12:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-11  0:58 [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/deadline: do not try to push tasks if pinned task switches to dl Wanpeng Li
2014-10-21 10:11 ` Juri Lelli
2014-10-21 12:14   ` Wanpeng Li

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox