From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched/dl: Fix preemption checks
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:43:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54477C4D.9040502@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413909356.19914.128.camel@tkhai>
Hi Kirill,
On 21/10/14 17:35, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> 1)switched_to_dl() check is wrong. We reschedule only
> if rq->curr is deadline task, and we do not reschedule
> if it's a lower priority task. But we must always
> preempt a task of other classes.
>
> 2)dl_task_timer():
> Policy does not change in case of priority inheritance.
> rt_mutex_setprio() changes prio, while policy remains old.
>
> So we lose some balancing logic in dl_task_timer() and
> switched_to_dl() when we check policy instead of priority.
> Boosted task may be rq->curr.
>
> (I didn't change switched_from_dl() because no check is
> necessary there at all).
>
> I've looked at this place(switched_to_dl) several times
> and even fixed this function, but found just now...
> I suppose some performance tests may work better after this.
>
> Completely untested, just RFC.
>
> Juri how about this?
>
I'll have to give it a spin, but it looks good.
Thanks,
- Juri
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 256e577..937a875 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
> dl_se->dl_yielded = 0;
> if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
> enqueue_task_dl(rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
> - if (task_has_dl_policy(rq->curr))
> + if (dl_task(rq->curr))
> check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0);
> else
> resched_curr(rq);
> @@ -1607,8 +1607,12 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> /* Only reschedule if pushing failed */
> check_resched = 0;
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> - if (check_resched && task_has_dl_policy(rq->curr))
> - check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0);
> + if (check_resched) {
> + if (dl_task(rq->curr))
> + check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0);
> + else
> + resched_curr(rq);
> + }
> }
> }
>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-22 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 16:35 [RFC] sched/dl: Fix preemption checks Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-22 9:43 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2014-10-28 11:03 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54477C4D.9040502@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox