* [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling @ 2014-10-22 8:21 chai wen 2014-10-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: perf: armv7: wrap unsupported arch init functions via micro chai wen 2014-10-22 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling Mark Rutland 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: chai wen @ 2014-10-22 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: will.deacon Cc: linux, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, yuichi.kusakabe, chai wen Idx sanity check was once implemented separately in these counter handling functions and then return value was treated as a judgement. armv7_pmnc_select_counter() armv7_pmnc_enable_counter() armv7_pmnc_disable_counter() armv7_pmnc_enable_intens() armv7_pmnc_disable_intens() But we do not need to do this now, and the return of idx is useless. Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c index 116758b..f66a9b8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c @@ -564,13 +564,11 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(u32 pmnc, int idx) return pmnc & BIT(ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx)); } -static inline int armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx) +static inline void armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx) { u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 5" : : "r" (counter)); isb(); - - return idx; } static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event) @@ -585,8 +583,10 @@ static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event) smp_processor_id(), idx); else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER) asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : "=r" (value)); - else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) + else { + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx); asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : "=r" (value)); + } return value; } @@ -602,40 +602,38 @@ static inline void armv7pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value) smp_processor_id(), idx); else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER) asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" (value)); - else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) + else { + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx); asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" (value)); + } } static inline void armv7_pmnc_write_evtsel(int idx, u32 val) { - if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) { - val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK; - asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val)); - } + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx); + val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK; + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val)); } -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx) +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx) { u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); - return idx; } -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx) +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx) { u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); - return idx; } -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx) +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx) { u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); - return idx; } -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx) +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx) { u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); @@ -643,8 +641,6 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx) /* Clear the overflow flag in case an interrupt is pending. */ asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 3" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); isb(); - - return idx; } static inline u32 armv7_pmnc_getreset_flags(void) -- 1.7.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: perf: armv7: wrap unsupported arch init functions via micro 2014-10-22 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling chai wen @ 2014-10-22 8:21 ` chai wen 2014-10-22 11:01 ` Mark Rutland 2014-10-22 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling Mark Rutland 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: chai wen @ 2014-10-22 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: will.deacon Cc: linux, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, yuichi.kusakabe, chai wen Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 52 +++++++++----------------------------- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c index f66a9b8..6c088e8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c @@ -1459,43 +1459,17 @@ static int krait_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) return 0; } #else -static inline int armv7_a8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) -{ - return -ENODEV; -} - -static inline int armv7_a9_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) -{ - return -ENODEV; -} - -static inline int armv7_a5_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) -{ - return -ENODEV; -} - -static inline int armv7_a15_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) -{ - return -ENODEV; -} - -static inline int armv7_a7_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) -{ - return -ENODEV; -} - -static inline int armv7_a12_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) -{ - return -ENODEV; -} - -static inline int armv7_a17_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) -{ - return -ENODEV; -} - -static inline int krait_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) -{ - return -ENODEV; -} +#define WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(__FUNC) \ +static inline int __FUNC(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) \ +{ \ + return -ENODEV; \ +} +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a8_pmu_init); +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a9_pmu_init); +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a5_pmu_init); +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a15_pmu_init); +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a7_pmu_init); +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a12_pmu_init); +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a17_pmu_init); +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(krait_pmu_init); #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_V7 */ -- 1.7.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: perf: armv7: wrap unsupported arch init functions via micro 2014-10-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: perf: armv7: wrap unsupported arch init functions via micro chai wen @ 2014-10-22 11:01 ` Mark Rutland 2014-10-22 11:22 ` Chai Wen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mark Rutland @ 2014-10-22 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: chai wen Cc: Will Deacon, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, yuichi.kusakabe@jp.fujitsu.com Hi, On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:21:47AM +0100, chai wen wrote: > Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 52 +++++++++----------------------------- > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) I'm currently in the process of decoupling perf_event_{xscale,v6,v7}.c, which will result in the removal of these stubs and for the ARMv7, ARMv6, and XScale perf backends. I haven't yet posted all the patches, but the basic idea is to make the arm_pmu code stateless and turn it into a library used by each of the three backends mentioned above. Each would have their own pmu_probe_info table (introduced in [1]), and would support the platform device IDs introduced in commit 253d8c3d2518ca6f (arm: perf: add more specific platform device IDs). The stubs would no longer be necessary. [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-October/295822.html Thanks, Mark. > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c > index f66a9b8..6c088e8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c > @@ -1459,43 +1459,17 @@ static int krait_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) > return 0; > } > #else > -static inline int armv7_a8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) > -{ > - return -ENODEV; > -} > - > -static inline int armv7_a9_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) > -{ > - return -ENODEV; > -} > - > -static inline int armv7_a5_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) > -{ > - return -ENODEV; > -} > - > -static inline int armv7_a15_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) > -{ > - return -ENODEV; > -} > - > -static inline int armv7_a7_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) > -{ > - return -ENODEV; > -} > - > -static inline int armv7_a12_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) > -{ > - return -ENODEV; > -} > - > -static inline int armv7_a17_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) > -{ > - return -ENODEV; > -} > - > -static inline int krait_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) > -{ > - return -ENODEV; > -} > +#define WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(__FUNC) \ > +static inline int __FUNC(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) \ > +{ \ > + return -ENODEV; \ > +} > +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a8_pmu_init); > +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a9_pmu_init); > +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a5_pmu_init); > +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a15_pmu_init); > +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a7_pmu_init); > +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a12_pmu_init); > +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a17_pmu_init); > +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(krait_pmu_init); > #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_V7 */ > -- > 1.7.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: perf: armv7: wrap unsupported arch init functions via micro 2014-10-22 11:01 ` Mark Rutland @ 2014-10-22 11:22 ` Chai Wen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Chai Wen @ 2014-10-22 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, yuichi.kusakabe@jp.fujitsu.com On 10/22/2014 07:01 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:21:47AM +0100, chai wen wrote: >> Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 52 +++++++++----------------------------- >> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > I'm currently in the process of decoupling perf_event_{xscale,v6,v7}.c, > which will result in the removal of these stubs and for the ARMv7, > ARMv6, and XScale perf backends. > > I haven't yet posted all the patches, but the basic idea is to make the > arm_pmu code stateless and turn it into a library used by each of the > three backends mentioned above. Each would have their own pmu_probe_info > table (introduced in [1]), and would support the platform device IDs > introduced in commit 253d8c3d2518ca6f (arm: perf: add more specific > platform device IDs). The stubs would no longer be necessary. > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-October/295822.html Hi Mark Got it. Thanks for your information. Your patches looks reasonable, I am OK with it. thanks chai wen > > Thanks, > Mark. > >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c >> index f66a9b8..6c088e8 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c >> @@ -1459,43 +1459,17 @@ static int krait_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) >> return 0; >> } >> #else >> -static inline int armv7_a8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) >> -{ >> - return -ENODEV; >> -} >> - >> -static inline int armv7_a9_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) >> -{ >> - return -ENODEV; >> -} >> - >> -static inline int armv7_a5_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) >> -{ >> - return -ENODEV; >> -} >> - >> -static inline int armv7_a15_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) >> -{ >> - return -ENODEV; >> -} >> - >> -static inline int armv7_a7_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) >> -{ >> - return -ENODEV; >> -} >> - >> -static inline int armv7_a12_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) >> -{ >> - return -ENODEV; >> -} >> - >> -static inline int armv7_a17_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) >> -{ >> - return -ENODEV; >> -} >> - >> -static inline int krait_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) >> -{ >> - return -ENODEV; >> -} >> +#define WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(__FUNC) \ >> +static inline int __FUNC(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) \ >> +{ \ >> + return -ENODEV; \ >> +} >> +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a8_pmu_init); >> +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a9_pmu_init); >> +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a5_pmu_init); >> +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a15_pmu_init); >> +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a7_pmu_init); >> +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a12_pmu_init); >> +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(armv7_a17_pmu_init); >> +WRAP_UNSUPPORTED_INIT(krait_pmu_init); >> #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_V7 */ >> -- >> 1.7.1 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >> > . > -- Regards Chai Wen ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling 2014-10-22 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling chai wen 2014-10-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: perf: armv7: wrap unsupported arch init functions via micro chai wen @ 2014-10-22 10:47 ` Mark Rutland 2014-10-22 11:26 ` Chai Wen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mark Rutland @ 2014-10-22 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: chai wen Cc: Will Deacon, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, yuichi.kusakabe@jp.fujitsu.com, Sudeep Holla Hi, On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:21:46AM +0100, chai wen wrote: > Idx sanity check was once implemented separately in these counter handling > functions and then return value was treated as a judgement. > armv7_pmnc_select_counter() > armv7_pmnc_enable_counter() > armv7_pmnc_disable_counter() > armv7_pmnc_enable_intens() > armv7_pmnc_disable_intens() > But we do not need to do this now, and the return of idx is useless. > > Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> It looks like the validation was moved out of all of these functions in 7279adbd9bb8ef8f (ARM: perf: check ARMv7 counter validity on a per-pmu basis), and we just missed the opportunity to simplify callers at the time. It would be nice if we mentioned that in the commit message -- it takes a while to figure out and it's handy for reference. > --- > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c > index 116758b..f66a9b8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c > @@ -564,13 +564,11 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(u32 pmnc, int idx) > return pmnc & BIT(ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx)); > } > > -static inline int armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx) > +static inline void armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx) > { > u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); > asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 5" : : "r" (counter)); > isb(); > - > - return idx; > } > > static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event) > @@ -585,8 +583,10 @@ static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event) > smp_processor_id(), idx); > else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER) > asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : "=r" (value)); > - else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) > + else { > + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx); > asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : "=r" (value)); > + } Please make the braces consistent -- if one branch in an if .. else chain needs them, they all do (see Documentation/CodingStyle). > > return value; > } > @@ -602,40 +602,38 @@ static inline void armv7pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value) > smp_processor_id(), idx); > else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER) > asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" (value)); > - else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) > + else { > + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx); > asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" (value)); > + } Likewise here. Otherwise this looks like a nice cleanup to me, so with those changes: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Thanks, Mark. > } > > static inline void armv7_pmnc_write_evtsel(int idx, u32 val) > { > - if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) { > - val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK; > - asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val)); > - } > + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx); > + val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK; > + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val)); > } > > -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx) > +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx) > { > u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); > asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); > - return idx; > } > > -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx) > +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx) > { > u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); > asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); > - return idx; > } > > -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx) > +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx) > { > u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); > asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); > - return idx; > } > > -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx) > +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx) > { > u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); > asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); > @@ -643,8 +641,6 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx) > /* Clear the overflow flag in case an interrupt is pending. */ > asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 3" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); > isb(); > - > - return idx; > } > > static inline u32 armv7_pmnc_getreset_flags(void) > -- > 1.7.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling 2014-10-22 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling Mark Rutland @ 2014-10-22 11:26 ` Chai Wen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Chai Wen @ 2014-10-22 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, yuichi.kusakabe@jp.fujitsu.com, Sudeep Holla On 10/22/2014 06:47 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:21:46AM +0100, chai wen wrote: >> Idx sanity check was once implemented separately in these counter handling >> functions and then return value was treated as a judgement. >> armv7_pmnc_select_counter() >> armv7_pmnc_enable_counter() >> armv7_pmnc_disable_counter() >> armv7_pmnc_enable_intens() >> armv7_pmnc_disable_intens() >> But we do not need to do this now, and the return of idx is useless. >> >> Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > > It looks like the validation was moved out of all of these functions in > 7279adbd9bb8ef8f (ARM: perf: check ARMv7 counter validity on a per-pmu > basis), and we just missed the opportunity to simplify callers at the > time. > > It would be nice if we mentioned that in the commit message -- it takes > a while to figure out and it's handy for reference. > Yeah, sorry for forgetting to point out that. >> --- >> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------ >> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c >> index 116758b..f66a9b8 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c >> @@ -564,13 +564,11 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(u32 pmnc, int idx) >> return pmnc & BIT(ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx)); >> } >> >> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx) >> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx) >> { >> u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); >> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 5" : : "r" (counter)); >> isb(); >> - >> - return idx; >> } >> >> static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event) >> @@ -585,8 +583,10 @@ static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event) >> smp_processor_id(), idx); >> else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER) >> asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : "=r" (value)); >> - else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) >> + else { >> + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx); >> asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : "=r" (value)); >> + } > > Please make the braces consistent -- if one branch in an if .. else > chain needs them, they all do (see Documentation/CodingStyle). > >> >> return value; >> } >> @@ -602,40 +602,38 @@ static inline void armv7pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value) >> smp_processor_id(), idx); >> else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER) >> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" (value)); >> - else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) >> + else { >> + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx); >> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" (value)); >> + } > > Likewise here. > > Otherwise this looks like a nice cleanup to me, so with those changes: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Thanks for your review. I'll send a update version later. thanks chai wen > > Thanks, > Mark. > >> } >> >> static inline void armv7_pmnc_write_evtsel(int idx, u32 val) >> { >> - if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) { >> - val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK; >> - asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val)); >> - } >> + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx); >> + val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK; >> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val)); >> } >> >> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx) >> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx) >> { >> u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); >> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); >> - return idx; >> } >> >> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx) >> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx) >> { >> u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); >> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); >> - return idx; >> } >> >> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx) >> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx) >> { >> u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); >> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); >> - return idx; >> } >> >> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx) >> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx) >> { >> u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); >> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); >> @@ -643,8 +641,6 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx) >> /* Clear the overflow flag in case an interrupt is pending. */ >> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 3" : : "r" (BIT(counter))); >> isb(); >> - >> - return idx; >> } >> >> static inline u32 armv7_pmnc_getreset_flags(void) >> -- >> 1.7.1 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >> > . > -- Regards Chai Wen ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-22 11:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-10-22 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling chai wen 2014-10-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: perf: armv7: wrap unsupported arch init functions via micro chai wen 2014-10-22 11:01 ` Mark Rutland 2014-10-22 11:22 ` Chai Wen 2014-10-22 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling Mark Rutland 2014-10-22 11:26 ` Chai Wen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox