From: Marcin Jabrzyk <m.jabrzyk@samsung.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PROBLEM: BUG appearing when trying to allocate interrupt on Exynos MCT after CPU hotplug
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:51:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544907D4.1020409@samsung.com> (raw)
[1.] One line summary of the problem: "BUG: sleeping function called
from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1250" after CPU hotplug
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
This was tested on Exynos 3250 board with
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/24/441 applied. Board is booting to
/bin/sh. After executing:
mount -t sysfs sys /sys && echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
&& echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
I'm getting:
[ 7.226405] IRQ258 no longer affine to CPU1
[ 7.226629] CPU1: shutdown
[ 7.230037] CPU1: Software reset
[ 7.231822] CPU1: Booted secondary processor
[ 7.231843] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
mm/slub.c:1250
[ 7.231850] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 0, name: swapper/1
[ 7.231861] Preemption disabled at:[< (null)>] (null)
[ 7.231864]
[ 7.231876] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.17.0-dirty #45
[ 7.231914] [<c0013c04>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010eac>]
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 7.231931] [<c0010eac>] (show_stack) from [<c03ffd0c>]
(dump_stack+0x70/0xbc)
[ 7.231950] [<c03ffd0c>] (dump_stack) from [<c00b9a20>]
(kmem_cache_alloc+0xe8/0x184)
[ 7.231968] [<c00b9a20>] (kmem_cache_alloc) from [<c0059710>]
(request_threaded_irq+0x64/0x128)
[ 7.231985] [<c0059710>] (request_threaded_irq) from [<c030ecc8>]
(exynos4_local_timer_setup+0xc0/0x13c)
[ 7.232000] [<c030ecc8>] (exynos4_local_timer_setup) from
[<c030ede4>] (exynos4_mct_cpu_notify+0x30/0xa8)
[ 7.232016] [<c030ede4>] (exynos4_mct_cpu_notify) from [<c0038540>]
(notifier_call_chain+0x44/0x84)
[ 7.232034] [<c0038540>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c0021144>]
(__cpu_notify+0x28/0x44)
[ 7.232049] [<c0021144>] (__cpu_notify) from [<c0012af0>]
(secondary_start_kernel+0xe8/0x138)
[ 7.232062] [<c0012af0>] (secondary_start_kernel) from [<400086a4>]
(0x400086a4)
The problem is that request_irq is calling allocation with GFP_KERNEL
flag in atomic block.
This bug should be easy observable on any board with
"samsung,exynos4210-mct" compatible MCT block.
[4.1.] Kernel version (from /proc/version):
3.17.0
[4.2.] Kernel .config file:
exynos_defconfig + DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and DEBUG_PREEMPT
[7.] A small shell script or example program which triggers the
problem (if possible)
mount -t sysfs sys /sys && echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
&& echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
[8.] Environment
/bin/sh
When SoC have MCT_INT_SPI interrupt it is being allocated after
hotplugging of the CPU, secondary_start_kernel() is sending CPU boot
notifications which are send when preemption and interrupts are
disabled. Exynos_mct notification handler tries to set up and allocate
IRQ for SPI type interrupt for started CPU and then BUG appears.
There might be similar problem on qcom-timer I think just after looking
on the code.
Best regards,
--
Marcin Jabrzyk
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
next reply other threads:[~2014-10-23 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-23 13:51 Marcin Jabrzyk [this message]
2014-10-23 14:06 ` PROBLEM: BUG appearing when trying to allocate interrupt on Exynos MCT after CPU hotplug Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-23 18:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-24 13:22 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2014-10-27 20:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-29 10:38 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-01-31 1:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31 9:21 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-02-02 8:47 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544907D4.1020409@samsung.com \
--to=m.jabrzyk@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).