Re: [PATCH v13 4/5] ARM: dts: add main Thermal info to rk3288

[Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>]

Dmitry,

在 2014/10/24 10:32, Dmitry Torokhov 写道:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:06:43AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> 在 2014/10/24 9:37, Dmitry Torokhov 写道:
>>> On October 23, 2014 6:08:52 PM PDT, Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>>> Dmitry,
>>>>
>>>> 在 2014/10/24 8:46, Dmitry Torokhov 写道:
>>>>> Hi Caesar,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:40:06PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>>>>> This patch is depend on rk3288-thermal.dtsi,or
>>>>>> it will compile error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the temperature over a period of time High,over 120C
>>>>>> the resulting TSHUT gave CRU module,let it reset
>>>>>> the entire chip,or via GPIO give PMIC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>    1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
>>>>>> index cb18bb4..85fc17a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
>>>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>>>>>    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>>>>>    #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
>>>>>>    #include <dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h>
>>>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
>>>>>>    #include "skeleton.dtsi"
>>>>>>    / {
>>>>>> @@ -66,6 +67,7 @@
>>>>>>    				 216000  900000
>>>>>>    				 126000  900000
>>>>>>    			>;
>>>>>> +			#cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
>>>>>>    			clock-latency = <40000>;
>>>>>>    			clocks = <&cru ARMCLK>;
>>>>>>    		};
>>>>>> @@ -346,6 +348,19 @@
>>>>>>    		status = "disabled";
>>>>>>    	};
>>>>>> +	tsadc: tsadc@ff280000 {
>>>>>> +		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-tsadc";
>>>>>> +		reg = <0xff280000 0x100>;
>>>>>> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>>> +		clocks = <&cru SCLK_TSADC>, <&cru PCLK_TSADC>;
>>>>>> +		clock-names = "tsadc", "apb_pclk";
>>>>>> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>>>> +		pinctrl-0 = <&otp_out>;
>>>>>> +		#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> +		hw-shut-temp = <120000>;
>>>>> I do not think this is a good value. You have (in the other DTS file)
>>>>> passive trip point at 80 and critical (which should result in orderly
>>>>> shutdown) at 125. But here you define hardware-controlled shutdown at
>>>>> 120C, which is backwards. You should have:
>>>>>
>>>>> passive <= critical <= hardware
>>>> Hmmm....
>>>> but, the system will shutdown when temperature over critial value,
>>>> there is no chance of triggering the TSHUT.
>>>>
>>>> If the temperature over a period of time High,as we know,
>>>> the resulting TSHUT gave CRU module,let it hot-reset the entire chip,
>>>> or via GPIO give PMIC cold-reset the entire chip.
>>> Having tshut trigger is not the goal, tshut is the measure of last resort. If we can handle thermal conditions without triggering tshut, we achieved our goal.
>>>
>>> Tshut triggering is " oh, crap, nothing we tried works" scenario.
>> I don't think so.
>>
>> In general,We should have:
>> passive <= hardware(reset entire chip) <= critical(shutdown)
>>
>> The temperature be rising qulckly if have some other conditions,
>> the "critical" will play a role.
> No, I think it should be the other way around: if we are unable to cool
> down the laptop under load we need to shut it down and let it cool. If
> for some reason we are unable to shut it down in orderly fashion (kernel
> is stuck holding a lock or similar) then hardware will reset it.
>
> At least that's how I understand it.
hmmm....

OK,agree,this is a option.

I think I should set hw-shut-temp = <125000>;
and critical = <120000>;

> Thanks.
>

-- 
Best regards,
Caesar