Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos4415: Add clocks using common clock framework

[Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>]

Hi Chanwoo,

On 24/10/14 16:07, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
[...]
>> How about prefixing the table names below with "exynos4415", rather than
>> "samsung" ?
> 
> 'struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock' is common for Exynos SoC.
> 
> Do you means that add 'exynos4415' prefix as following:
> - fixed_factor_clks -> exynos4415_fixed_factor_clks

Yes, it makes sense IMHO, even though those symbols are static.
It's done like that in other SoC drivers, e.g. exynos3250.

>>> +static struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock fixed_factor_clks[] __initdata = {
>>
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct samsung_fixed_rate_clock fixed_rate_clks[] __initdata = {
>>> +	FRATE(CLK_SCLK_HDMIPHY, "sclk_hdmiphy", NULL, CLK_IS_ROOT, 27000000),
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct samsung_mux_clock mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>>
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct samsung_div_clock div_clks[] __initdata = {
>>
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct samsung_gate_clock gate_clks[] __initdata = {
> 
> Do you want to change structure naming as following?
> fixed_factor_clks -> exynos4415_fixed_factor_clks
> fixed_rate_clks -> exynos4415_fixed_rate_clks
> mux_clks -> exynos4415_mux_clks
> div_clks -> exynos4415_div_clks
> gate_clks -> exynos4415_gate_clks

Yes, please.

-- 
Thanks,
Sylwester