From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751540AbaJYSYQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2014 14:24:16 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]:39219 "EHLO mail-oi0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750749AbaJYSYO (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2014 14:24:14 -0400 Message-ID: <544BDC8F.2030308@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 10:23:27 -0700 From: Florian Fainelli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Lunn , Guenter Roeck CC: netdev , "David S. Miller" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] net: dsa: Add support for hardware monitoring References: <54488CE1.2000106@roeck-us.net> <20141023134706.GB25190@lunn.ch> <20141023162754.GA21343@roeck-us.net> <20141023165459.GE25190@lunn.ch> <20141023173847.GA22988@roeck-us.net> <20141023180357.GG25190@lunn.ch> <20141023184322.GA24281@roeck-us.net> <20141023195526.GH25190@lunn.ch> <20141024161919.GA29600@roeck-us.net> <20141025140116.GA12051@lunn.ch> In-Reply-To: <20141025140116.GA12051@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/25/14 07:01, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> Here is another naming option: >> >> em1dsa0-virtual-0 > > I prefer this over isa. > > However, i think there should be some sort of separator between the > network device name and dsa. Considering that network devices can be renamed, do we want it to be included in the sensor name at all? -- Florian