From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: Add a chapter on conditional compilation
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:35:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <545187B6.1090704@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV2Z0+gon8+LP_7X2h4B4Hb3KAV2vpZ9kRwC2mVFGLWXw@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/29/14 12:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
>> Document several common practices and conventions regarding conditional
>> compilation, most notably the preference for ifdefs in headers rather
>> than .c files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>
>> +If you have a function or variable which may potentially go unused in a
>> +particular configuration, and the compiler would warn about its definition
>> +going unused, mark the definition as __maybe_unused rather than wrapping it in
>> +a preprocessor conditional. (However, if a function or variable *always* goes
>> +unused, delete it.)
>
> Personally, I don't like __maybe_unused. Once it's there, the compiler
> will stop warning about it, even if it really becomes unused.
>
> Apart from that:
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Is the compiler smart enough to delete (discard) the code or data instance
if it is unused or is the code or data actually wasting space?
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-29 18:15 [PATCH] CodingStyle: Add a chapter on conditional compilation Josh Triplett
2014-10-29 19:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-10-29 22:20 ` Josh Triplett
2014-10-30 0:35 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2014-10-30 2:24 ` Josh Triplett
2014-10-30 3:33 ` Martin Kelly
2014-11-03 16:46 ` Jonathan Corbet
2014-11-03 17:47 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-03 18:05 ` Josh Triplett
2014-11-03 18:39 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=545187B6.1090704@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox