From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759396AbaJ3LvB (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:51:01 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:33369 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759338AbaJ3Lu7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:50:59 -0400 Message-ID: <54522615.7040002@collabora.co.uk> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:50:45 +0100 From: Javier Martinez Canillas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Samuel Ortiz , Lee Jones , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org CC: Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Chanwoo Choi Subject: Re: [RFT v3 06/14] regulator: max77802: Remove support for board files References: <1414668053-31370-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1414668053-31370-7-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <1414668053-31370-7-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Krzysztof, On 10/30/2014 12:20 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > static int max77802_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct max77686_dev *iodev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); > - struct max77686_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(iodev->dev); > struct max77802_regulator_prv *max77802; > - int i, ret = 0, val; > + int i, val; > struct regulator_config config = { }; > > - /* This is allocated by the MFD driver */ > - if (!pdata) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no platform data found for regulator\n"); > - return -ENODEV; > - } > - > max77802 = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, > sizeof(struct max77802_regulator_prv), > GFP_KERNEL); > if (!max77802) > return -ENOMEM; > > - if (iodev->dev->of_node) { > - ret = max77802_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(pdev, pdata); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > + if (!pdev->dev.of_node) { > + /* > + * Backward DTS compatiblity where regulator driver had not > + * a compatible property for itself. > + */ > + if (!iodev->dev->of_node) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No OF node for driver and its parent\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + pdev->dev.of_node = of_get_child_by_name(iodev->dev->of_node, > + "regulators"); > + max77802->missing_of_node = true; > } I may be missing something but I don't understand why a compatible string for the regulators sub-node is needed. Isn't enough to just fill the .regulators_node field in the struct regulator_desc? e.g: .regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators") for max77802 .regulators_node = of_match_ptr("voltage-regulators") for max77686 AFAIU this should be enough for the core to extract the init_data and will make your change much more simpler and you can drop patches 1-3 and 13-14. Or maybe I misread the regulator_of_get_init_data() function? Best regards, Javier