From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
hch@infradead.org, axboe@fb.com, dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: Block: Add blk-mq support
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 19:27:54 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5456AFEA.6000507@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5456AE72.1010409@nod.at>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2108 bytes --]
On 11/02/2014 07:21 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Ezequiel,
>
> Am 02.11.2014 um 22:52 schrieb Ezequiel Garcia:
>> Maybe you can explain a bit better what's this all about?
>
> In short, blk-mq is the future and the current blk interface will be legacy. :-)
> Christoph asked me to convert the MTD block drivers to blk-mq.
>
Ah, OK. That makes sense then.
>> Both the commit that introduces blk-mq and the paper on it talk about
>> high IOPS devices, multi-core, NUMA systems. I'm not sure this is the
>> case for UBI-based devices.
>>
>> Probably some numbers would help us decide. Does the patch increases the
>> dynamic memory footprint? Is there any performance benefit?
>
> I did a very rough micro benchmark:
>
> root@(none):~# dd if=/dev/ubiblock0_0 of=/dev/null bs=1M
> 121+1 records in
> 121+1 records out
> 127420416 bytes (127 MB) copied, 1.59056 s, 80.1 MB/s
>
> vs.
>
> root@(none):~# dd if=/dev/ubiblock0_0 of=/dev/null bs=1M
> 121+1 records in
> 121+1 records out
> 127420416 bytes (127 MB) copied, 0.916117 s, 139 MB/s
>
> So, yes there is a performance gain.
>
Wow. Where did you run this and on top of what storage device?
I'm still interested in the memory footprint, UBI is already heavy enough.
>> I kind of like the negative diffstat, but the code doesn't look cleaner
>> or simpler.
>>
>> In other words, we need a good reason before we agree on making this
>> "zen style" driver more complex.
>
> After reading my patch again I think we could move ubiblock_read_to_sg()
> to kapi.c or io.c. It is rather generic and maybe we can tun more UBI users to
> scattergather such that less vmalloc()s are needed.
>
> This would also make the diffstat nicer...
>
Yes, any additional effort to make the current patch any simpler would
be great. In its current form it seems rather cumbersome to me.
If you can re-submit something better and put a more verbose commit log,
I'd really appreciate it :)
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-02 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-02 13:00 [PATCH] UBI: Block: Add blk-mq support Richard Weinberger
2014-11-02 21:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-11-02 22:21 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-02 22:27 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2014-11-02 22:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-03 1:20 ` Jens Axboe
2014-11-03 1:18 ` Jens Axboe
2014-11-03 5:03 ` Ming Lei
2014-11-03 13:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-11-03 18:22 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-03 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-03 8:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-07 9:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-07 9:53 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-07 9:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5456AFEA.6000507@free-electrons.com \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox