public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] block: Expand a bit documentation about elevator_allow_merge_fn
@ 2014-11-04 11:52 Jan Kara
  2014-11-04 15:27 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2014-11-04 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: axboe; +Cc: LKML, Jan Kara

Explain that two requests can be merged without
elevator_allow_merge_fn() being called.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 Documentation/block/biodoc.txt | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

So in the end my discussion about request merging with the customer concluded
similarly as ours wrt CFQ. It may be an issue but it happens rarely enough
that it probably isn't worth an extra hook. I'm just sending a doc update
because the fact that elevator_allow_merge_fn isn't called for all merges
is somewhat surprising.

diff --git a/Documentation/block/biodoc.txt b/Documentation/block/biodoc.txt
index 2101e718670d..82a0b0d8f4f3 100644
--- a/Documentation/block/biodoc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/block/biodoc.txt
@@ -946,7 +946,11 @@ elevator_allow_merge_fn		called whenever the block layer determines
 				request safely. The io scheduler may still
 				want to stop a merge at this point if it
 				results in some sort of conflict internally,
-				this hook allows it to do that.
+				this hook allows it to do that. Note however
+				that two *requests* can still be merged at later
+				time. Currently io scheduler has no way to
+				prevent that. It can only learn about the fact
+				from elevator_merge_req_fn callback.
 
 elevator_dispatch_fn*		fills the dispatch queue with ready requests.
 				I/O schedulers are free to postpone requests by
-- 
1.8.1.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: Expand a bit documentation about elevator_allow_merge_fn
  2014-11-04 11:52 [PATCH] block: Expand a bit documentation about elevator_allow_merge_fn Jan Kara
@ 2014-11-04 15:27 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2014-11-04 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kara; +Cc: LKML

On 2014-11-04 04:52, Jan Kara wrote:
> Explain that two requests can be merged without
> elevator_allow_merge_fn() being called.

Thanks Jan, applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-04 15:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-04 11:52 [PATCH] block: Expand a bit documentation about elevator_allow_merge_fn Jan Kara
2014-11-04 15:27 ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox