public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: gnurou@gmail.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	gregkh@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: tegra: move serial aliases to per-board
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:14:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5463A390.2040609@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141112122017.GC30821@ulmo.nvidia.com>

On 11/12/2014 05:20 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:49:30PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> There are general changes pending to make the /aliases/serial* entries
>> number the serial ports on the system. On tegra, so far the ports have been
>> just numbered dynamically as they are configured so that makes them change.
>>
>> To avoid this, add specific aliases per board to keep the old numbers. This
>> allows us to change the numbering by default on future SoCs while keeping the
>> numbering on existing boards.
...
> I have applied this to the for-3.19/dt branch. So for anything that is
> post Tegra124 the new rule shall be to add aliases to the SoC .dtsi and
> then use consistent numbering of UART ports across boards?
>
> The alternative is to remain consistent with what this patch does, which
> would be to make the serial port numbering a property of the board. That
> doesn't sound too bad to me either since it'll hide all the unused ports
> on a given board.

For new SoCs, I think board-specific aliases would make most sense. That 
would be consistent with this patch. The only question I had was for 
existing SoCs, should we make the switch this patch does, or leave the 
aliases inactive there? New SoCs should use more sensible aliases.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-12 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-11 20:49 [PATCH] ARM: dts: tegra: move serial aliases to per-board Olof Johansson
2014-11-11 21:14 ` Stephen Warren
2014-11-11 22:45   ` Olof Johansson
2014-11-11 23:39     ` Stephen Warren
2014-11-12 10:46   ` Lucas Stach
2014-11-12 12:20 ` Thierry Reding
2014-11-12 17:07   ` Olof Johansson
2014-11-13 11:27     ` Thierry Reding
2014-11-13 16:17       ` Thierry Reding
2014-11-12 18:14   ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2014-11-13 12:04     ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5463A390.2040609@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox