From: "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>
To: Minfei Huang <mhuang@redhat.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/iommu: fix incorrect bit operations in setting values
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:06:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546474AF.2030902@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141112112832.GA3334@dhcp-17-108.nay.redhat.com>
Minfei,
Thanks for your testing.
On my system, I got error messages:
[ 8.019096] usb usb2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2,
SerialNumber=1
[ 8.019617] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 102
[ 8.019621] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [01:00.0] fault addr
fff6a000
[ 8.019621] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
[ 8.019627] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202
[ 8.019631] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [21:00.0] fault addr
fff6a000
[ 8.019631] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
[ 8.019638] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202
[ 8.019641] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [41:00.0] fault addr
fff6a000
[ 8.019641] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
[ 8.019647] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202
[ 8.019651] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [61:00.0] fault addr
fff6a000
[ 8.019651] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
And this patch can fix this.
The reason you do not get error messages may be there is no ongoing DMA
request on your PCI devices when kdump kernel boots, I am not sure of
this.
Zhenhua
On 11/12/2014 07:28 PM, Minfei Huang wrote:
> The kdump starts 2nd kernel without any error message when I use
> 3.18.0-rc4 merged last 6 patchs. The following is the message which 2nd
> kernel prints during booting.
>
> Patchset:
> 0001-iommu-vt-d-Update-iommu_attach_domain-and-its-caller.patch
> 0002-iommu-vt-d-Items-required-for-kdump.patch
> 0003-iommu-vt-d-data-types-and-functions-used-for-kdump.patch
> 0004-iommu-vt-d-Add-domain-id-functions.patch
> 0005-iommu-vt-d-enable-kdump-support-in-iommu-module.patch
> 0006-x86-iommu-fix-incorrect-bit-operations-in-setting-va.patch
>
> log:
> [ 1.689604] IOMMU intel_iommu_in_crashdump = true
> [ 1.694310] IOMMU Skip disabling iommu hardware translations
> [ 1.699987] DMAR: No ATSR found
> [ 1.703151] IOMMU Copying translate tables from panicked kernel
> [ 1.710786] IOMMU: root_new_virt:0xffff8800296ec000 phys:0x0000296ec000
> [ 1.717401] IOMMU:0 Domain ids from panicked kernel:
> [ 1.722364] DID did:13(0x000d)
> [ 1.725424] DID did:12(0x000c)
> [ 1.728482] DID did:11(0x000b)
> [ 1.731542] DID did:10(0x000a)
> [ 1.734603] DID did:6(0x0006)
> [ 1.737574] DID did:7(0x0007)
> [ 1.740549] DID did:5(0x0005)
> [ 1.743522] DID did:9(0x0009)
> [ 1.746495] DID did:8(0x0008)
> [ 1.749467] DID did:4(0x0004)
> [ 1.752439] DID did:3(0x0003)
> [ 1.755413] DID did:2(0x0002)
> [ 1.758385] DID did:0(0x0000)
> [ 1.761357] DID did:1(0x0001)
> [ 1.764331] ----------------------------------------
> [ 1.769302] IOMMU 0 0xfed50000: using Queued invalidation
>
> On 11/05/14 at 03:30pm, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
>> The function context_set_address_root() and set_root_value are setting new
>> address in a wrong way, and this patch is trying to fix this problem.
>>
>> According to Intel Vt-d specs(Feb 2011, Revision 1.3), Chapter 9.1 and 9.2,
>> field ctp in root entry is using bits 12:63, field asr in context entry is
>> using bits 12:63.
>>
>> To set these fields, the following functions are used:
>> static inline void context_set_address_root(struct context_entry *context,
>> unsigned long value);
>> and
>> static inline void set_root_value(struct root_entry *root, unsigned long value)
>>
>> But they are using an invalid method to set these fields, in current code, only
>> a '|' operator is used to set it. This will not set the asr to the expected
>> value if it has an old value.
>>
>> For example:
>> Before calling this function,
>> context->lo = 0x3456789012111;
>> value = 0x123456789abcef12;
>>
>> After we call context_set_address_root(context, value), expected result is
>> context->lo == 0x123456789abce111;
>>
>> But the actual result is:
>> context->lo == 0x1237577f9bbde111;
>>
>> So we need to clear bits 12:63 before setting the new value, this will fix
>> this problem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li, Zhen-Hua <zhen-hual@hp.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> index a27d6cb..11ac47b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static inline void set_root_present(struct root_entry *root)
>> }
>> static inline void set_root_value(struct root_entry *root, unsigned long value)
>> {
>> + root->val &= ~VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>> root->val |= value & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -247,6 +248,7 @@ static inline void context_set_translation_type(struct context_entry *context,
>> static inline void context_set_address_root(struct context_entry *context,
>> unsigned long value)
>> {
>> + context->lo &= ~VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>> context->lo |= value & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.0.0-rc0
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-13 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-05 7:30 [PATCH 1/1] x86/iommu: fix incorrect bit operations in setting values Li, Zhen-Hua
2014-11-05 7:35 ` Li, ZhenHua
2014-11-06 13:41 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-11-12 11:28 ` Minfei Huang
2014-11-13 9:06 ` Li, ZhenHua [this message]
2014-11-13 13:37 ` Baoquan He
2014-11-14 1:29 ` Li, ZhenHua
2014-11-14 8:12 ` Li, ZhenHua
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546474AF.2030902@hp.com \
--to=zhen-hual@hp.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhuang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox