From: "Lu, Baolu" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Rework "xhci: clear root port wake on bits if controller isn't wake-up capable"
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:14:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546573A3.60303@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415242253-72501-1-git-send-email-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Hi Mathias,
This patch series has been acked by Alan Stern. There seems no further
comments from others. Can you please pull in it?
Thanks,
-baolu
On 2014年11月06日 10:50, Lu Baolu wrote:
> This serie of patch reworks commit ff8cbf250b448aac35589f6075082c3fcad8a8fe.
> This has been discussed at http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg114986.html
> It also includes a patch to fix a comment in drivers/usb/host/xhci.h.
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Refine xhci_disable_port_wake_on_bits().
> - Add "Acked-by: Alan Stern"
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Need to consider run-time suspend as well.
> - Change "wake-up capable" to "allowed to do wakeup"
> in both comments and patch description.
> - Add "Suggested-by: Alan Stern"
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Should not be a quirk.
> - Should be applied to all xhci controllers.
>
> Lu Baolu (3):
> usb: xhci: Revert "xhci: clear root port wake on bits if controller
> isn't wake-up capable"
> usb: xhci: This reworks ff8cbf250b448aac35589f6075082c3fcad8a8fe
> usb: xhci: fix comment for PORT_DEV_REMOVE
>
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 5 +----
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 10 +++++++++-
> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-14 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-06 2:50 [PATCH v4 0/3] Rework "xhci: clear root port wake on bits if controller isn't wake-up capable" Lu Baolu
2014-11-06 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] usb: xhci: Revert " Lu Baolu
2014-11-06 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] usb: xhci: This reworks ff8cbf250b448aac35589f6075082c3fcad8a8fe Lu Baolu
2014-11-06 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] usb: xhci: fix comment for PORT_DEV_REMOVE Lu Baolu
2014-11-14 3:14 ` Lu, Baolu [this message]
2014-11-14 8:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Rework "xhci: clear root port wake on bits if controller isn't wake-up capable" Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546573A3.60303@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox