From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann@mni.thm.de>,
Michael Marineau <mike@marineau.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Subject: Re: 3.18-rc regression: drm/nouveau: use shared fences for readable objects
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:41:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546DA92B.9080501@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546D2309.90201@mni.thm.de>
Op 20-11-14 om 00:08 schreef Tobias Klausmann:
> On 19.11.2014 09:10, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> ...
>> On the EDITED patch from fixed-fences-for-bisect, can you do the following:
>>
>> In nouveau/nv84_fence.c function nv84_fence_context_new, remove
>>
>> fctx->base.sequence = nv84_fence_read(chan);
>>
>> and add back
>>
>> nouveau_bo_wr32(priv->bo, chan->chid * 16/4, 0x00000000);
>>
>> ...
>
> Added the above on top of your "fixed-fences-for-bisect" branch and guessed it would work, but did not :/
> Anyway, as this "initializes" the fence to a known state, maybe you should consider pushing that.
Hey,
There is a reason I don't set it to a known state on nv84+.
Channel 2 is created, fence seqno ends up being 100, other channel waits on seqno reaching 100.
Channel 2 is destroyed, and immediately recreated. Seqno is reset to 0.
Other channel waits for channel 2's seqno being 100.
The other channel can keep waiting indefinitely.
I guess it might be useful to reset the contents of the bo to zero on allocation, but it should not be done in fence_context_new.
~Maarten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-20 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-19 6:43 3.18-rc regression: drm/nouveau: use shared fences for readable objects Michael Marineau
2014-11-19 8:10 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-11-19 15:18 ` Tobias Klausmann
2014-11-19 23:08 ` Tobias Klausmann
2014-11-20 8:41 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2014-11-20 4:06 ` Michael Marineau
2014-11-20 8:53 ` Maarten Lankhorst
[not found] ` <CAHW-aUcv3g7mGxmZawe-mfMMdFNnkKep-u-JyH9hhJqoaMM2Mw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-22 16:56 ` Maarten Lankhorst
[not found] ` <CAHW-aUe8SNbnPwCLsT9rqw3S5meA+feW85UQtWT6HogKsB971Q@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAHW-aUdPKQf4yU_NnsRxXrFrW2Zi-v9QyajHaYU-exMzsXH4eg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-25 7:43 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-11-26 20:29 ` Michael Marineau
2014-11-27 1:18 ` Tobias Klausmann
2014-11-27 8:33 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-11-30 21:10 ` Michael Marineau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-29 0:51 Ian Kumlien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546DA92B.9080501@canonical.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike@marineau.org \
--cc=tobias.johannes.klausmann@mni.thm.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).