linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
	Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc,sem block sem_lock on sma->lock during sma initialization
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:03:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546FC4D9.6010600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141121124229.933a9b6ef9725a4032c95d45@linux-foundation.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/21/2014 03:42 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:29:27 -0500 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 11/21/2014 03:09 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:52:26 -0500 Rik van Riel
>>> <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> When manipulating just one semaphore with semop, sem_lock
>>>> only takes that single semaphore's lock. This creates a
>>>> problem during initialization of the semaphore array, when
>>>> the data structures used by sem_lock have not been set up
>>>> yet. The sma->lock is already held by newary, and we just
>>>> have to make sure everything else waits on that lock during
>>>> initialization.
>>>> 
>>>> Luckily it is easy to make sem_lock wait on the sma->lock,
>>>> by pretending there is a complex operation in progress while
>>>> the sma is being initialized.
>>>> 
>>>> The newary function already zeroes sma->complex_count before 
>>>> unlocking the sma->lock.
>>> 
>>> What are the runtime effects of the bug?
>>> 
>> 
>> NULL pointer dereference in spin_lock from sem_lock, if it is
>> called before sma->sem_base has been pointed somewhere valid.
> 
> Help us out here.  People need to use this description to work out 
> which kernel versions need the patch and whether to backport the
> fix into their various kernels.  Other people will be starting at
> this changelog wondering "will this fix the bug my customer has
> reported".
> 
> Is there some bug report people can look at?
> 
> What userspace actions trigger this bug?

The reason the bug took almost two years to get noticed is that
it takes one task doing a semop on a semaphore in an array that
is still getting instantiated by newary (getsem) from another
task.

In other words, if you try to use a semaphore array before
getsem returns, you can oops the task that calls semop.

It should not cause any damage to long-living kernel data
structures.

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUb8TZAAoJEM553pKExN6DzJUH/RYSovikk+36KH0uFQN44txj
ZkEM6BsT7I6W9zBiK4OCPpwYCr5gy2xsXH7bLzCgzRV/YmjLFdw20DhDfSo14GO/
1ByYcsUcsZ+lPJZ+g4IKi57VW4T+NLa1T4CoJ84+1QVGKYlpc7mlwc8suTGBhKvQ
5Eq1o1KOE9ZtAG5Go8OYH7frwalkrYE0YJbGN9PW0pUvZ7FilEiMJIkznIetRS6K
WK05dK52DMKeXFxzuxVhSRcCZb2+bHZn3qFOmon6kHbMqgzRZCKMcdydtoIvcFq7
cA5eTt6V6je3XVhc4lsSfP9cHraLDZZIjkaJ856fBpgJ30ypsHcpVY6UKTbFSHo=
=u1Vg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-21 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-21 19:52 [PATCH] ipc,sem block sem_lock on sma->lock during sma initialization Rik van Riel
2014-11-21 20:07 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-11-21 20:09 ` Andrew Morton
2014-11-21 20:29   ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-21 20:42     ` Andrew Morton
2014-11-21 23:03       ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-11-22  0:56         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-11-22  3:40           ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-22 13:56             ` Manfred Spraul
2014-11-22 15:53               ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-22 19:14     ` Manfred Spraul
2014-11-22 20:14       ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-23 18:23 ` Manfred Spraul
2014-11-23 21:03   ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-23 21:36     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-11-24 10:41       ` Rafael Aquini
2014-11-24 20:49   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=546FC4D9.6010600@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).