public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ftrace/core v6 4/5] kprobes: Set IPMODIFY flag only if the probe can change regs->ip
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:43:01 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54729B35.3040501@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141121151548.7bd8bcd9@gandalf.local.home>

(2014/11/22 5:15), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:25:30 -0500
> Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> wrote:
> 
>> Set FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY flag only for the probes which can change
>> regs->ip, which has kprobe->break_handler.
>> Currently we can not put jprobe and another ftrace handler which
>> changes regs->ip on the same function because all kprobes have
>> FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY flag. This removes FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY
>> flag from kprobes and only when the user uses jprobe (or the
>> kprobe.break_handler != NULL) we add additinal ftrace_ops with
>> FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY on target function.
>>
>> Note about the implementation: This uses a dummy ftrace_ops to
>> reserve IPMODIFY flag on the given ftrace address, for the case
>> that we have a enabled kprobe on a function entry and a jprobe
>> is added on the same point. In that case, we already have a
>> ftrace_ops without IPMODIFY flag on the entry, and we have to
>> add another ftrace_ops with IPMODIFY on the same address.
>> If we put a same handler on both ftrace_ops, the handler can
>> be called twice on that entry until the first one is removed.
>> This means that the kprobe and the jprobe are called twice too,
>> and that will not what kprobes expected.
>> Thus I added a dummy ftrace_ops just for reserving IPMODIFY flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
>> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> Changes in v4:
>>  - Increment refcounter after succeeded to register ftrace_ops.
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>>  - Update __ftrace_add/remove_filter_ip() according to
>>    Namhyng's comments (thanks!)
>>  - Split out regs->ip recovering code from this patch.
>> ---
>>  Documentation/kprobes.txt |   12 ++--
>>  kernel/kprobes.c          |  125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>  2 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/kprobes.txt b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
>> index 4227ec2..eb03efc 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/kprobes.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
>> @@ -264,15 +264,13 @@ stop-machine method that ksplice uses for supporting a CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
>>  kernel.
>>  
>>  NOTE for geeks:
>> -The jump optimization changes the kprobe's pre_handler behavior.
>> -Without optimization, the pre_handler can change the kernel's execution
>> +The jump optimization (and ftrace-based kprobes) changes the kprobe's
>> +pre_handler behavior.
>> +Without optimizations, the pre_handler can change the kernel's execution
>>  path by changing regs->ip and returning 1.  However, when the probe
>>  is optimized, that modification is ignored.  Thus, if you want to
>> -tweak the kernel's execution path, you need to suppress optimization,
>> -using one of the following techniques:
>> -- Specify an empty function for the kprobe's post_handler or break_handler.
>> - or
>> -- Execute 'sysctl -w debug.kprobes_optimization=n'
>> +tweak the kernel's execution path, you need to suppress optimization or
>> +notify your handler will modify regs->ip by setting p->break_handler.
>>  
>>  1.5 Blacklist
>>  
>> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
>> index 831978c..4b4b7c5 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
>> @@ -915,10 +915,93 @@ static struct kprobe *alloc_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
>>  static struct ftrace_ops kprobe_ftrace_ops __read_mostly = {
>>  	.func = kprobe_ftrace_handler,
>> -	.flags = FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS | FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY,
>> +	.flags = FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS,
>>  };
>>  static int kprobe_ftrace_enabled;
>>  
>> +static void kprobe_ftrace_stub(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1,
>> +			struct ftrace_ops *op, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +	/* Do nothing. This is just a dummy handler */
>> +}
> 
> Feel free to just use ftrace_stub instead. That's what it's there for.

Ah, I didn't know that. OK :)

>> +
>> +/* This is only for checking conflict with other ftrace users */
>> +static struct ftrace_ops kprobe_ipmod_ftrace_ops __read_mostly = {
>> +	.func = kprobe_ftrace_stub,
>> +	.flags = FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS | FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY,
>> +};
>> +static int kprobe_ipmod_ftrace_enabled;
>> +
>> +static int __ftrace_add_filter_ip(struct ftrace_ops *ops, unsigned long ip,
>> +				  int *ref)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/* Try to set given ip to filter */
>> +	ret = ftrace_set_filter_ip(ops, ip, 0, 0);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	if (*ref == 0) {
>> +		ret = register_ftrace_function(ops);
>> +		if (ret < 0) {
>> +			/* Rollback the filter */
>> +			ftrace_set_filter_ip(ops, ip, 1, 0);
>> +			goto out;
> 
> Why the goto out, and not just return ret?
> 
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	(*ref)++;
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	return ret;
> 
> Probably could just return 0 here.

Agreed.

> 
> Rest looks fine.

Thank you!

> 
> -- Steve
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __ftrace_remove_filter_ip(struct ftrace_ops *ops, unsigned long ip,
>> +				     int *ref)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (*ref == 1) {
>> +		ret = unregister_ftrace_function(ops);
>> +		if (ret < 0)
>> +			return ret;
>> +		/*Ignore failure, because it is already unregistered */
>> +		ftrace_set_filter_ip(ops, ip, 1, 0);
>> +	} else {
>> +		/* Try to remove given ip to filter */
>> +		ret = ftrace_set_filter_ip(ops, ip, 1, 0);
>> +		if (ret < 0)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	(*ref)--;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
> 


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com



  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-24  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-21 10:25 [PATCH ftrace/core v6 0/5] ftrace, kprobes: Introduce IPMODIFY flag for ftrace_ops to detect conflicts Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-21 10:25 ` [PATCH ftrace/core v6 1/5] kprobes/ftrace: Recover original IP if pre_handler doesn't change it Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-21 10:25 ` [PATCH ftrace/core v6 2/5] ftrace, kprobes: Support IPMODIFY flag to find IP modify conflict Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-21 18:05   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-21 19:43     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-24  2:12       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-24  2:06     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-21 10:25 ` [PATCH ftrace/core v6 3/5] kprobes: Add IPMODIFY flag to kprobe_ftrace_ops Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-21 10:25 ` [PATCH ftrace/core v6 4/5] kprobes: Set IPMODIFY flag only if the probe can change regs->ip Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-21 20:15   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-24  2:43     ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2015-01-26 16:14   ` Petr Mladek
2015-02-24  7:38     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-24  8:52       ` Petr Mladek
2015-02-24 11:47         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-24 13:10           ` Petr Mladek
2014-11-21 10:25 ` [PATCH ftrace/core v6 5/5] kselftest, ftrace: Add ftrace IPMODIFY flag test Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-21 21:03   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-24  2:50     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-24  4:29       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-24 14:11         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-24 15:07           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-24 15:18             ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-24 15:19               ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25  1:51                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-24 16:18           ` Shuah Khan
2014-11-25  1:23             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-25 14:42               ` Shuah Khan
2014-11-25 14:44                 ` Shuah Khan
2014-11-26  7:20                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-26 18:40                     ` Shuah Khan
2014-11-27  4:56                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-11-26 14:31           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-27  0:55             ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54729B35.3040501@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox