public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:48:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5478530B.3090102@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2351041.YbSYt1FKtz@wuerfel>

On 28/11/2014 11:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2014 10:36:09 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> On 27/11/2014 18:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>>> On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>>>>> On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>>>>> This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
>>>>>> support for older Atmel SoCs.
>>>>>> Again, for the record, it was announced here
>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/293 ([ANNOUNCE] ARM: at91: removal of board
>>>>>> files) two months ago.
>>>>>> Several files beyond at91rm9200 are touched this time as I tried to remove the
>>>>>> biggest parts that were related to !DT SoC initializations. More cleanup is
>>>>>> certainly needed to remove dead code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The diffstat is also pretty big as a lot of at91rm9200 boards were remaining.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Awesome stuff!
>>>>>
>>>>> Two questions:
>>>>>
>>>>> - is anything holding this up from getting merged in 3.19?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you think this is not too late in the cycle, I would say go ahead 
>>>
>>> I'd say we should do it, unless there are last-minute regressions.
>>
>> Arnd,
>>
>> I am totally in favor for a merge into 3.19.
>> I wanted to wait one day or two but given that the official announce had
>> been made several months ago, I don't think it makes a big difference.
>>
>> So, what do you prefer:
>>
>> 1/ I wait today and send you the pull-request this evening (our time)
>> 2/ I send you the pull-request at the beginning of next week but still
>> can make it for 3.19?
> 
> Just send the pull request whenever you have it ready. If some bug shows
> up, reply to that mail with an updated pull request.

Okay, I do it right now then.

Thanks Arnd.


>> (BTW, in the meantime, there is a pending pull-request (at91-cleanup3)
>> but it is true that you needn't pulling it in if you plan to take this
>> one which will be named at91-cleanup4 and that will obviously contain
>> the 3rd one).
> 
> Yes, I have a backlog of pull requests to look at, should get to that soon
> today.
> 
> 	Arnd
> 
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-28 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-27 16:06 [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] ARM: at91: remove at91rm9200 legacy boards files Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] ARM: at91: remove at91rm9200 legacy board support Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] ARM: at91: switch configuration option to SOC_AT91RM9200 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] ARM: at91/Kconfig: remove ARCH_AT91RM9200 option for drivers Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] ARM: at91: always USE_OF from now on Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] ARM: at91/trivial: update Kconfig comment to mention SAMA5 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] ARM: at91: remove all !DT related configuration options Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] ARM: at91: remove clock data in at91sam9n12.c and at91sam9x5.c files Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] ARM: at91: remove old at91-specific clock driver Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] ARM: at91: remove legacy IRQ driver and related code Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:20   ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] ARM: at91: remove unused IRQ function declarations Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:49 ` [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200 Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 17:12   ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-27 17:38     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28  9:36       ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-28 10:25         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 10:48           ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2014-11-27 23:12     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 23:39       ` Boris Brezillon
2014-11-27 23:41         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28  0:28       ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-28  8:27         ` Alexander Stein
2014-11-28  8:49           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 11:31             ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-28 12:06               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 11:13 ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5478530B.3090102@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox