From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: <tixy@linaro.org>, <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <lizefan@huawei.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/7] ARM: probes: move all probe code to dedicate directory
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:23:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <547D9308.8080403@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547D471B.2070908@hitachi.com>
On 2014/12/2 12:59, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/12/01 17:48), Wang Nan wrote:
>> In discussion on LKML (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/28/158), Russell
>> King suggest to move all probe related code to arch/arm/probes. This
>> patch do the work. Due to dependency on 'arch/arm/kernel/patch.h', this
>> patch also move patch.h to 'arch/arm/include/asm/patch.h', and related
>> '#include' directive are also midified to '#include <asm/patch.h>'.
>
> Moving is good to me, but renaming files are also required I think.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm/{kernel => include/asm}/patch.h | 0
>> arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 16 ++--------------
>> arch/arm/kernel/jump_label.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/kernel/patch.c | 3 +--
>> arch/arm/probes/Makefile | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-arm.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-common.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test-arm.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test-thumb.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test.h | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-thumb.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes.h | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-arm.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-arm.h | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-thumb.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-thumb.h | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes.h | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/uprobes-arm.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/uprobes.c | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/uprobes.h | 0
>
> As I did on x86, these would be better renamed as expressing what they do.
> I guess most of the files may have emulate-*.c or decode-*.c :)
>
> Thank you,
>
OK. I posted another patch in this thread. The directory tree is as follow:
arch/arm/probes/
|-- Makefile
|-- decode-arm.c
|-- decode-arm.h
|-- decode-thumb.c
|-- decode-thumb.h
|-- decode.c
|-- decode.h
|-- kprobes
| |-- actions-arm.c
| |-- actions-common.c
| |-- actions-thumb.c
| |-- kprobes.c
| |-- kprobes.h
| |-- test-arm.c
| |-- test-core.c
| |-- test-core.h
| `-- test-thumb.c
`-- uprobes
|-- actions-arm.c
|-- uprobes.c
`-- uprobes.h
2 directories, 19 files
What do you think?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-02 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-01 8:45 [PATCH v11 0/7] ARM: kprobes: OPTPROBES and other improvements Wang Nan
2014-12-01 8:48 ` [PATCH v11 1/7] ARM: probes: move all probe code to dedicate directory Wang Nan
2014-12-02 4:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-02 10:16 ` [PATCH] " Wang Nan
2014-12-02 10:23 ` Wang Nan [this message]
2014-12-03 4:38 ` Re: [PATCH v11 1/7] " Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-03 5:28 ` Wang Nan
2014-12-03 6:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-01 8:48 ` [PATCH v11 2/7] ARM: kprobes: introduces checker Wang Nan
2014-12-01 8:48 ` [PATCH v11 3/7] ARM: kprobes: collects stack consumption for store instructions Wang Nan
2014-12-01 8:48 ` [PATCH v11 4/7] ARM: kprobes: disallow probing stack consuming instructions Wang Nan
2014-12-01 8:48 ` [PATCH v11 5/7] ARM: kprobes: Add test cases for " Wang Nan
2014-12-01 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 6/7] kprobes: Pass the original kprobe for preparing optimized kprobe Wang Nan
2014-12-01 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 7/7] ARM: kprobes: enable OPTPROBES for ARM 32 Wang Nan
2014-12-02 18:38 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2014-12-03 3:22 ` Wang Nan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=547D9308.8080403@huawei.com \
--to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=tixy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox