public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: <tixy@linaro.org>, <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/7] ARM: probes: move all probe code to dedicate directory
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:23:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <547D9308.8080403@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547D471B.2070908@hitachi.com>

On 2014/12/2 12:59, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/12/01 17:48), Wang Nan wrote:
>> In discussion on LKML (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/28/158), Russell
>> King suggest to move all probe related code to arch/arm/probes. This
>> patch do the work. Due to dependency on 'arch/arm/kernel/patch.h', this
>> patch also move patch.h to 'arch/arm/include/asm/patch.h', and related
>> '#include' directive are also midified to '#include <asm/patch.h>'.
> 
> Moving is good to me, but renaming files are also required I think.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/Makefile                                |  1 +
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => include/asm}/patch.h         |  0
>>  arch/arm/kernel/Makefile                         | 16 ++--------------
>>  arch/arm/kernel/jump_label.c                     |  2 +-
>>  arch/arm/kernel/patch.c                          |  3 +--
>>  arch/arm/probes/Makefile                         | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-arm.c        |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-common.c     |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test-arm.c   |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test-thumb.c |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test.c       |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test.h       |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-thumb.c      |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes.c            |  2 +-
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes.h            |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-arm.c         |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-arm.h         |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-thumb.c       |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-thumb.h       |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes.c             |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes.h             |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/uprobes-arm.c        |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/uprobes.c            |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/uprobes.h            |  0
> 
> As I did on x86, these would be better renamed as expressing what they do.
> I guess most of the files may have emulate-*.c or decode-*.c :)
> 
> Thank you,
> 

OK. I posted another patch in this thread. The directory tree is as follow:

arch/arm/probes/
|-- Makefile
|-- decode-arm.c
|-- decode-arm.h
|-- decode-thumb.c
|-- decode-thumb.h
|-- decode.c
|-- decode.h
|-- kprobes
|   |-- actions-arm.c
|   |-- actions-common.c
|   |-- actions-thumb.c
|   |-- kprobes.c
|   |-- kprobes.h
|   |-- test-arm.c
|   |-- test-core.c
|   |-- test-core.h
|   `-- test-thumb.c
`-- uprobes
    |-- actions-arm.c
    |-- uprobes.c
    `-- uprobes.h

2 directories, 19 files

What do you think?

> 
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-02 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-01  8:45 [PATCH v11 0/7] ARM: kprobes: OPTPROBES and other improvements Wang Nan
2014-12-01  8:48 ` [PATCH v11 1/7] ARM: probes: move all probe code to dedicate directory Wang Nan
2014-12-02  4:59   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-02 10:16     ` [PATCH] " Wang Nan
2014-12-02 10:23     ` Wang Nan [this message]
2014-12-03  4:38       ` Re: [PATCH v11 1/7] " Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-03  5:28         ` Wang Nan
2014-12-03  6:27           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-12-01  8:48 ` [PATCH v11 2/7] ARM: kprobes: introduces checker Wang Nan
2014-12-01  8:48 ` [PATCH v11 3/7] ARM: kprobes: collects stack consumption for store instructions Wang Nan
2014-12-01  8:48 ` [PATCH v11 4/7] ARM: kprobes: disallow probing stack consuming instructions Wang Nan
2014-12-01  8:48 ` [PATCH v11 5/7] ARM: kprobes: Add test cases for " Wang Nan
2014-12-01  8:49 ` [PATCH v11 6/7] kprobes: Pass the original kprobe for preparing optimized kprobe Wang Nan
2014-12-01  8:49 ` [PATCH v11 7/7] ARM: kprobes: enable OPTPROBES for ARM 32 Wang Nan
2014-12-02 18:38   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2014-12-03  3:22     ` Wang Nan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=547D9308.8080403@huawei.com \
    --to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=tixy@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox