From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262563AbVG2KmX (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:42:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262577AbVG2KmW (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:42:22 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:41896 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262563AbVG2KmL (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:42:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:42:08 +0200 (MEST) From: "Michael Kerrisk" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael.kerrisk@gmx.net, akpm@osdl.org, chrisw@osdl.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20050729083850.GB7302@elte.hu> Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:_Broke_nice_range_for_RLIMIT_NICE?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #24879014 Message-ID: <5482.1122633728@www71.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > The other downside is, this obviously changes any existing configs > > actually using this by one nice level.. > > it's pretty harmless, and i doubt the use of this is all that wide (if > existent at all - utilities have not been updated yet). Lets fix it > ASAP, preferably in 2.6.13. Yes, as noted in my earlier message -- at the moment RLIMIT_NICE still isn't in the current glibc snapshot... Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 Want to help with man page maintenance? Grab the latest tarball at ftp://ftp.win.tue.nl/pub/linux-local/manpages/ and grep the source files for 'FIXME'.