From: Akira Hayakawa <ruby.wktk@gmail.com>
To: ejt@redhat.com
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
snitzer@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] staging: writeboost: Add dm-writeboost
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:59:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548843A0.6040906@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141210123349.GC21108@debian>
Joe,
I appreciate your continuous work.
Is that read or write?
The difference between Type 0 and 1 should only show up in write path.
So is it write test?
And what is the unit of each result?
> So maybe it's just volume of IO that's causing the problem? What's
> the difference between Type 0 and Type 1? In the code I notice you
> have 'rambuf' structures, are you caching IO in memory?
"rambuf" is a temporary space that every write data comes in.
127*4KB data are once stored there and 4KB metadata section are added
then it becomes a log and flushed to the cache device sequentially (512KB each).
By the way,
I think more clearer discussion can be done if tests are done on physical machines
to isolate things relevant to VM. I will also add these tests to dmts later and
run on my machine.
But, it will be much better if we have good server with RAID-ed backing store
and the newest SSD (How would it be if it's PCI-e SSD)...
- Akira
On 12/10/14 9:33 PM, Joe Thornber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 08:00:13PM +0900, Akira Hayakawa wrote:
>> Hi, Joe
>>
>> Thanks for continuous evaluation.
>
> Some more details:
>
> dd, with block size 512b
> ------------------------
>
> raw spindle : 143
> writeboost Type 0: 137
> writeboost Type 1: 130
>
> dd, with block size 4k
> ----------------------
>
> raw spindle : 31
> writeboost Type 0: 29
> writeboost Type 1: 81
>
>
> dd, with block size 64m
> -----------------------
>
> raw spindle : 8.9
> writeboost Type 0: 32
> writeboost Type 1: 72
>
>
>
> So maybe it's just volume of IO that's causing the problem? What's
> the difference between Type 0 and Type 1? In the code I notice you
> have 'rambuf' structures, are you caching IO in memory?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-07 12:35 [PATCH] staging: writeboost: Add dm-writeboost Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-07 20:08 ` Greg KH
2014-12-07 21:04 ` Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-09 15:12 ` [dm-devel] " Joe Thornber
2014-12-09 15:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-10 10:21 ` Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-10 10:00 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] " Joe Thornber
2014-12-10 11:00 ` Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-10 11:22 ` Joe Thornber
2014-12-10 12:33 ` Joe Thornber
2014-12-10 12:59 ` Akira Hayakawa [this message]
2014-12-10 13:13 ` Joe Thornber
2014-12-10 13:31 ` Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-10 13:42 ` Joe Thornber
2014-12-10 14:43 ` Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-12 12:51 ` Marian Csontos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548843A0.6040906@gmail.com \
--to=ruby.wktk@gmail.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ejt@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).