Re: [PATCH] solo6x10: just pass frame motion flag from hardware, drop additional handling as complicated and unstable

[Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>]

On 12/11/2014 05:08 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> FYI: I need to test this myself and understand it better, so it will take some
>> time before I get to this. It is in my TODO list, so it won't be forgotten.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>         Hans
>>
>> On 11/05/2014 09:11 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
>>> Dropping code (introduced in 316d9e84a72069e04e483de0d5934c1d75f6a44c)
>>> which intends to make raising of motion events more "smooth"(?).
>>>
>>> It made motion event never appear in my installation.
>>> That code is complicated, so I couldn't figure out quickly how to fix
>>> it, so dropping it seems better to me.
>>>
>>> Another justification is that anyway application would implement
>>> "motion signal stabilization" if required, it is not necessarily kernel
>>> driver's job.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Utkin <andrey.utkin@corp.bluecherry.net>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c | 30 +-------------------------
>>>  drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10.h          |  2 --
>>>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>>

<snip>

>>
> 
> Hi Hans, how is it proceeding with the subject of this patch?

Still haven't had the time to check this, other than a very quick test run.
Don't worry, it's in my TODO list, so I can't forget, but it has been busier
than usual lately. And this is one patch I really like to test before
committing.

Fingers crossed that I might be able to do it either tomorrow or on Monday.
If that fails, then the next opportunity will be after Christmas as I won't
have access to the hardware for awhile.

Regards,

	Hans