public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <bmaurer@fb.com>, <rkroll@fb.com>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	<mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: change where we report sched stats V2
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:37:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <548F0025.4040203@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141215101625.GW29390@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 12/15/2014 05:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:59:55AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> The schedule stats currently spit out once the entity is being queued, which
>> means if we have stack traces enabled we will get the stack trace of the waker,
>> not of the task being woken.  This makes the backtrace completely useless when
>> trying to track down latency spikes, as we want to know why we were put to sleep
>> for as long as we were.
>>
>> This patch moves the trace_sched_stat* calls to after the task has been put back
>> on the CPU so that the backtrace we get is the one that put us to sleep.  Mike
>> Galbraith suggested that I leave the actual stat collection stuff where it is so
>> that we don't add the scheduler latency to the sleep stats, so I've added 3 new
>> fields in the scheduler stats to keep track of the last sleep time so that if
>> any of these are set we know to trigger the trace points.  Thanks,
>>
>
> Yeah, so I don't like this, it adds overhead for everyone.
>

Only if SCHEDSTATS is enabled tho, and it's no more overhead in the 
SCHEDSTATS case than before.  Would it be more acceptable to move the 
entire callback under SCHEDSTATS?

> Also, I'm very sure this issue has been raised before, and I'm pretty
> sure the answer back then was why don't you look at the
> trace_sched_switch() site matching this wakeup?
>

This is fine for discrete problems, but when trying to find a random 
latency spike in a production workload it's impossible. If I do

trace-cmd record -e sched:sched_switch -T sleep 5

on just one of our random web servers I end up with this

du -h trace.dat
62M     trace.dat

thats 62 megs in 5 seconds.  I ran the following command for almost 2 
hours when searching for a latency spike

trace-cmd record -B latency -e sched:sched_stat_blocked -f \"delay >= 
100000\" -T -o /root/latency.dat

and got the following .dat file

du -h latency.dat
48M     latency.dat

That right there is a huge reason for this change, so I'd really like to 
do whatever it takes to get this fixed.  I'd be happy to move the 
callback under CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS to reduce any possible overhead you 
would be concerned about.  Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-15 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-11 15:59 [PATCH] sched/fair: change where we report sched stats V2 Josef Bacik
2014-12-15 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-12-15 15:37   ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2014-12-15 17:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-12-15 17:30       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=548F0025.4040203@fb.com \
    --to=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=bmaurer@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkroll@fb.com \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox