From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Gu, Zheng" <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
tangchen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] workqueue: Update workqueue's possible cpumask when a new node, coming up.
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:18:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548FEAC7.4030705@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548FE8F6.3060100@jp.fujitsu.com>
(2014/12/16 17:10), Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2014/12/16 16:49), Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> On 12/15/2014 07:18 PM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>>> Workqueue keeps cpu<->node relationship including all possible cpus.
>>> The original information was made at boot but it may change when
>>> a new node is added.
>>>
>>> Update information if a new node is ready with using node-hotplug callback.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 2 ++
>>> kernel/workqueue.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 4 ++++
>>> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
>>> index 8f1a419..cd3cb67 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
>>> @@ -270,4 +270,6 @@ extern void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
>>> extern struct page *sparse_decode_mem_map(unsigned long coded_mem_map,
>>> unsigned long pnum);
>>>
>>> +/* update for workqueues */
>>> +void workqueue_node_register(int node);
>>> #endif /* __LINUX_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_H */
>>> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
>>> index 2fd0bd7..5499b76 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
>>> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
>>> static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache;
>>>
>>> static cpumask_var_t *wq_numa_possible_cpumask;
>>> - /* possible CPUs of each node */
>>> + /* PL: possible CPUs of each node */
>>>
>>> static bool wq_disable_numa;
>>> module_param_named(disable_numa, wq_disable_numa, bool, 0444);
>>> @@ -4559,6 +4559,32 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
>>> WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
>>> pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
>>> }
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>>> +
>>> +static void reflesh_wq_possible_mask(int cpu, int node)
>>> +{
>>> + int oldnode;
>>> + for_each_node_state(oldnode, N_POSSIBLE)
>>> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[oldnode]);
>>
>> You need to check and update all the wq->numa_pwq_tbl[oldnode]
>>
>
> you mean : if I drop patch 1/4, it will be required. Right ?
> I'll add that check.
Ah, isn't it handled by wq_update_unbound_numa() called at workqueue_cpu_down_callback() ?
Because node's online cpumask will be empty, new pwq will be attached.
Thanks
-Kame
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-16 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-12 10:19 [PATCH 0/5] workqueue: fix bug when numa mapping is changed Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] workqueue: fix memory leak in wq_numa_init() Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 5:25 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] workqueue: update wq_numa_possible_cpumask Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:18 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 2:02 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-25 20:16 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-18 2:22 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: fixup existing pool->node Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 1:23 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-25 20:14 ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-13 7:08 ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-13 15:24 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] workqueue: update NUMA affinity for the node lost CPU Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:27 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15 1:28 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-25 20:17 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: retry on NUMA_NO_NODE when create_worker() fails Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 16:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-12-12 17:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-12-12 17:29 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-12 17:13 ` [PATCH 0/5] workqueue: fix bug when numa mapping is changed Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-12-15 1:34 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-18 1:50 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-12-13 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] workqueue: fix bug when numa mapping is changed v2 Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: add a hook for node hotplug Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: add warning if pool->node is offline Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] workqueue: remove per-node unbound pool when node goes offline Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 2:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 2:06 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: handle change in cpu-node relationship Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 2:12 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 2:20 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 2:48 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 2:55 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 3:30 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 3:34 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 4:04 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 5:19 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 5:33 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:11 ` [PATCH 0/4] workqueue: fix memory allocation after numa mapping is changed v3 Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] workqueue:Fix unbound workqueue's node affinity detection Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 5:30 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16 7:32 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 7:54 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 11:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: update per-cpu workqueue's node affinity at,online-offline Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 5:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16 7:25 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] workqueue: Update workqueue's possible cpumask when a new node, coming up Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 7:49 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16 8:10 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 8:18 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2014-12-15 11:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: Handle cpu-node affinity change at CPU_ONLINE Kamezawa Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548FEAC7.4030705@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox