From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Staging driver patches for 3.19-rc1
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:35:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548FFCF3.9080303@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141215185638.GA8036@kroah.com>
Am 15.12.2014 um 19:56 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:41:03AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:39:15AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 07:23:35PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>> I don't understand this kind of logic.
>>>> a) Binder is considered a piece of shite.
>>>> b) Google is working on a (hopefully sane) replacement.
>>>>
>>>> Why moving it out of staging then? What is the benefit?
>>>
>>> There is none, and Greg didn't even bother addressing the various
>>> comments when this first came up.
>>
>> I thought I did, it was a long thread at the time, and I was on the road
>> for 3 weeks, sorry if I missed something.
>>
>>> So a clear NAK from me on this one.
>>
>> You don't have to maintain it, I do, so why does it concern you?
>
> Ok, that was a bit snotty on my part, I apologize.
>
> But really, this is self-contained, doesn't touch any core
> infrastructure, and is really just like any other driver for hardware
> that people don't use. It shouldn't affect anything elsewhere in the
> kernel, so objecting to it seems odd to me.
Doesn't it use internal stuff from fs/file.c?
Anyway, Linus pulled it.
I'm just a bit astonished that binder finally sneaked into the
core kernel. Hopefully no smart ass will ever decide to make
some userspace component hard depend on it...
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-16 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-15 17:55 [GIT PULL] Staging driver patches for 3.19-rc1 Greg KH
2014-12-15 18:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-12-15 18:30 ` Greg KH
2014-12-15 18:36 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-12-15 18:44 ` Greg KH
2014-12-15 19:04 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-12-15 19:32 ` Greg KH
2014-12-28 17:52 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-15 18:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-15 18:41 ` Greg KH
2014-12-15 18:56 ` Greg KH
2014-12-16 9:35 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2014-12-17 9:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-28 17:53 ` Andoid Binder sneaking in [was Re: [GIT PULL] Staging driver patches for 3.19-rc1] Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548FFCF3.9080303@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox