* [PATCH] memory: Add NVIDIA SMMU suspend/resume support
@ 2014-12-08 6:20 Mark Zhang
2014-12-12 8:18 ` Alexandre Courbot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Zhang @ 2014-12-08 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hdoyu, joro, swarren, thierry.reding, gnurou, olof
Cc: iommu, linux-tegra, linux-kernel, Mark Zhang
This patch adds suspend/resume support for NVIDIA SMMU.
This patch is created on top of Thierry Reding's patch set:
"[PATCH v7 00/12] NVIDIA Tegra memory controller and IOMMU support"
Signed-off-by: Mark Zhang <markz@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 21 ++++++++++++
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h | 4 +++
3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
index 0909e0bae9ec..ab38805055a4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
#include <soc/tegra/ahb.h>
#include <soc/tegra/mc.h>
+struct tegra_smmu_as;
+
struct tegra_smmu {
void __iomem *regs;
struct device *dev;
@@ -25,9 +27,10 @@ struct tegra_smmu {
const struct tegra_smmu_soc *soc;
unsigned long *asids;
+ struct tegra_smmu_as **as;
struct mutex lock;
- struct list_head list;
+ struct list_head swgroup_asid_list;
};
struct tegra_smmu_as {
@@ -40,6 +43,12 @@ struct tegra_smmu_as {
u32 attr;
};
+struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid {
+ struct list_head list;
+ unsigned swgroup_id;
+ unsigned asid;
+};
+
static inline void smmu_writel(struct tegra_smmu *smmu, u32 value,
unsigned long offset)
{
@@ -376,6 +385,7 @@ static int tegra_smmu_as_prepare(struct tegra_smmu *smmu,
as->smmu = smmu;
as->use_count++;
+ smmu->as[as->id] = as;
return 0;
}
@@ -386,6 +396,7 @@ static void tegra_smmu_as_unprepare(struct tegra_smmu *smmu,
return;
tegra_smmu_free_asid(smmu, as->id);
+ smmu->as[as->id] = NULL;
as->smmu = NULL;
}
@@ -398,6 +409,7 @@ static int tegra_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct of_phandle_args args;
unsigned int index = 0;
int err = 0;
+ struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid *sa = NULL;
while (!of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", index,
&args)) {
@@ -411,6 +423,14 @@ static int tegra_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
return err;
tegra_smmu_enable(smmu, swgroup, as->id);
+
+ sa = kzalloc(sizeof(struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sa->list);
+ sa->swgroup_id = swgroup;
+ sa->asid = as->id;
+ list_add_tail(&sa->list, &smmu->swgroup_asid_list);
+
index++;
}
@@ -427,6 +447,7 @@ static void tegra_smmu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *de
struct tegra_smmu *smmu = as->smmu;
struct of_phandle_args args;
unsigned int index = 0;
+ struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid *sa = NULL;
while (of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", index,
&args)) {
@@ -435,6 +456,13 @@ static void tegra_smmu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *de
if (args.np != smmu->dev->of_node)
continue;
+ list_for_each_entry(sa, &smmu->swgroup_asid_list, list) {
+ if (sa->asid == as->id && sa->swgroup_id == swgroup)
+ break;
+ }
+ list_del(&sa->list);
+ kfree(sa);
+
tegra_smmu_disable(smmu, swgroup, as->id);
tegra_smmu_as_unprepare(smmu, as);
index++;
@@ -651,6 +679,48 @@ static void tegra_smmu_ahb_enable(void)
}
}
+void tegra_smmu_resume(struct tegra_smmu *smmu)
+{
+ struct tegra_smmu_as *as = NULL;
+ unsigned int bit;
+ u32 value;
+ struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid *sa = NULL;
+
+ for_each_set_bit(bit, smmu->asids, smmu->soc->num_asids) {
+ as = smmu->as[bit];
+ smmu->soc->ops->flush_dcache(as->pd, 0, SMMU_SIZE_PD);
+
+ smmu_writel(smmu, as->id & 0x7f, SMMU_PTB_ASID);
+ value = SMMU_PTB_DATA_VALUE(as->pd, as->attr);
+ smmu_writel(smmu, value, SMMU_PTB_DATA);
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry(sa, &smmu->swgroup_asid_list, list)
+ tegra_smmu_enable(smmu, sa->swgroup_id, sa->asid);
+
+ value = SMMU_PTC_CONFIG_ENABLE | SMMU_PTC_CONFIG_INDEX_MAP(0x3f);
+
+ if (smmu->soc->supports_request_limit)
+ value |= SMMU_PTC_CONFIG_REQ_LIMIT(8);
+
+ smmu_writel(smmu, value, SMMU_PTC_CONFIG);
+
+ value = SMMU_TLB_CONFIG_HIT_UNDER_MISS |
+ SMMU_TLB_CONFIG_ACTIVE_LINES(0x20);
+
+ if (smmu->soc->supports_round_robin_arbitration)
+ value |= SMMU_TLB_CONFIG_ROUND_ROBIN_ARBITRATION;
+
+ smmu_writel(smmu, value, SMMU_TLB_CONFIG);
+
+ smmu_flush_ptc(smmu, NULL, 0);
+ smmu_flush_tlb(smmu);
+ smmu_writel(smmu, SMMU_CONFIG_ENABLE, SMMU_CONFIG);
+ smmu_flush(smmu);
+
+ tegra_smmu_ahb_enable();
+}
+
struct tegra_smmu *tegra_smmu_probe(struct device *dev,
const struct tegra_smmu_soc *soc,
struct tegra_mc *mc)
@@ -684,7 +754,14 @@ struct tegra_smmu *tegra_smmu_probe(struct device *dev,
if (!smmu->asids)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ smmu->as = devm_kzalloc(dev,
+ sizeof(struct tegra_smmu_as *) * soc->num_asids,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!smmu->as)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
mutex_init(&smmu->lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&smmu->swgroup_asid_list);
smmu->regs = mc->regs;
smmu->soc = soc;
diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c
index 9b7c1645fd59..aa0c59ccd33a 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c
@@ -283,6 +283,23 @@ static int tegra_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int tegra_mc_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tegra_mc_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct tegra_mc *mc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TEGRA_IOMMU_SMMU))
+ tegra_smmu_resume(mc->smmu);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
static struct platform_driver tegra_mc_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "tegra-mc",
@@ -291,6 +308,10 @@ static struct platform_driver tegra_mc_driver = {
},
.prevent_deferred_probe = true,
.probe = tegra_mc_probe,
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+ .suspend = tegra_mc_suspend,
+ .resume = tegra_mc_resume,
+#endif
};
static int tegra_mc_init(void)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h b/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h
index f714c309b960..cbf538b3f995 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h
+++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ static inline void mc_writel(struct tegra_mc *mc, u32 value,
struct tegra_smmu *tegra_smmu_probe(struct device *dev,
const struct tegra_smmu_soc *soc,
struct tegra_mc *mc);
+void tegra_smmu_resume(struct tegra_smmu *smmu);
#else
static inline struct tegra_smmu *
tegra_smmu_probe(struct device *dev, const struct tegra_smmu_soc *soc,
@@ -36,6 +37,9 @@ tegra_smmu_probe(struct device *dev, const struct tegra_smmu_soc *soc,
{
return NULL;
}
+void tegra_smmu_resume(struct tegra_smmu *smmu)
+{
+}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC
--
1.8.1.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] memory: Add NVIDIA SMMU suspend/resume support
2014-12-08 6:20 [PATCH] memory: Add NVIDIA SMMU suspend/resume support Mark Zhang
@ 2014-12-12 8:18 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-12-23 7:58 ` Mark Zhang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Courbot @ 2014-12-12 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Zhang
Cc: hdoyu, Joerg Roedel, Stephen Warren, Thierry Reding,
Olof Johansson, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Mark Zhang <markz@nvidia.com> wrote:
> This patch adds suspend/resume support for NVIDIA SMMU.
> This patch is created on top of Thierry Reding's patch set:
>
> "[PATCH v7 00/12] NVIDIA Tegra memory controller and IOMMU support"
You should have this comment under the "---" as we don't need it to
persist once this patch is merged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Zhang <markz@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 21 ++++++++++++
> drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h | 4 +++
> 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> index 0909e0bae9ec..ab38805055a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <soc/tegra/ahb.h>
> #include <soc/tegra/mc.h>
>
> +struct tegra_smmu_as;
> +
> struct tegra_smmu {
> void __iomem *regs;
> struct device *dev;
> @@ -25,9 +27,10 @@ struct tegra_smmu {
> const struct tegra_smmu_soc *soc;
>
> unsigned long *asids;
> + struct tegra_smmu_as **as;
> struct mutex lock;
>
> - struct list_head list;
> + struct list_head swgroup_asid_list;
> };
>
> struct tegra_smmu_as {
> @@ -40,6 +43,12 @@ struct tegra_smmu_as {
> u32 attr;
> };
>
> +struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid {
> + struct list_head list;
> + unsigned swgroup_id;
> + unsigned asid;
> +};
> +
> static inline void smmu_writel(struct tegra_smmu *smmu, u32 value,
> unsigned long offset)
> {
> @@ -376,6 +385,7 @@ static int tegra_smmu_as_prepare(struct tegra_smmu *smmu,
> as->smmu = smmu;
> as->use_count++;
>
> + smmu->as[as->id] = as;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -386,6 +396,7 @@ static void tegra_smmu_as_unprepare(struct tegra_smmu *smmu,
> return;
>
> tegra_smmu_free_asid(smmu, as->id);
> + smmu->as[as->id] = NULL;
> as->smmu = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -398,6 +409,7 @@ static int tegra_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct of_phandle_args args;
> unsigned int index = 0;
> int err = 0;
> + struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid *sa = NULL;
This initialization is unneeded. Actually this declaration would
probably be better placed in the while() loop below since its usage is
local to it.
>
> while (!of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", index,
> &args)) {
> @@ -411,6 +423,14 @@ static int tegra_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> return err;
>
> tegra_smmu_enable(smmu, swgroup, as->id);
> +
> + sa = kzalloc(sizeof(struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sa->list);
You don't need to call INIT_LIST_HEAD on this, list_add_tail() will
effectively overwrite any initialization done by this macro (see
include/linux/list.h).
> + sa->swgroup_id = swgroup;
> + sa->asid = as->id;
> + list_add_tail(&sa->list, &smmu->swgroup_asid_list);
> +
> index++;
> }
>
> @@ -427,6 +447,7 @@ static void tegra_smmu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *de
> struct tegra_smmu *smmu = as->smmu;
> struct of_phandle_args args;
> unsigned int index = 0;
> + struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid *sa = NULL;
Same here, move the declaration into the while() loop and remove the
initialization.
>
> while (of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", index,
> &args)) {
> @@ -435,6 +456,13 @@ static void tegra_smmu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *de
> if (args.np != smmu->dev->of_node)
> continue;
>
> + list_for_each_entry(sa, &smmu->swgroup_asid_list, list) {
> + if (sa->asid == as->id && sa->swgroup_id == swgroup)
> + break;
> + }
> + list_del(&sa->list);
> + kfree(sa);
> +
> tegra_smmu_disable(smmu, swgroup, as->id);
> tegra_smmu_as_unprepare(smmu, as);
> index++;
> @@ -651,6 +679,48 @@ static void tegra_smmu_ahb_enable(void)
> }
> }
>
> +void tegra_smmu_resume(struct tegra_smmu *smmu)
> +{
> + struct tegra_smmu_as *as = NULL;
> + unsigned int bit;
> + u32 value;
> + struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid *sa = NULL;
Again no need to initialize to NULL here.
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(bit, smmu->asids, smmu->soc->num_asids) {
> + as = smmu->as[bit];
> + smmu->soc->ops->flush_dcache(as->pd, 0, SMMU_SIZE_PD);
> +
> + smmu_writel(smmu, as->id & 0x7f, SMMU_PTB_ASID);
> + value = SMMU_PTB_DATA_VALUE(as->pd, as->attr);
> + smmu_writel(smmu, value, SMMU_PTB_DATA);
> + }
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(sa, &smmu->swgroup_asid_list, list)
> + tegra_smmu_enable(smmu, sa->swgroup_id, sa->asid);
Actually I wonder if you could not do completely without the list
here. How about the following:
1) add a "unsigned swgroup_id" member to tegra_smmu_as, set it in
tegra_smmu_attach_dev() instead of sa->asid
2) in the "for_each_bit" loop above, call tegra_smmu_enable(smmu,
as->swgroup_id, as->id) after the last smmu_writel()
Would that work? It would allow you to get rid of the
tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid struct as well as a few memory allocations. I
don't know if that kind of 1:1 matching between as and and swgroup
makes sense for the SMMU though, maybe Thierry or Hiroshi can confirm?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] memory: Add NVIDIA SMMU suspend/resume support
2014-12-12 8:18 ` Alexandre Courbot
@ 2014-12-23 7:58 ` Mark Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Zhang @ 2014-12-23 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Courbot
Cc: hdoyu, Joerg Roedel, Stephen Warren, Thierry Reding,
Olof Johansson, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 12/12/2014 04:18 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Mark Zhang <markz@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> This patch adds suspend/resume support for NVIDIA SMMU.
>
>
>> This patch is created on top of Thierry Reding's patch set:
>>
>> "[PATCH v7 00/12] NVIDIA Tegra memory controller and IOMMU support"
>
> You should have this comment under the "---" as we don't need it to
> persist once this patch is merged.
>
Yep, will do.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Zhang <markz@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 21 ++++++++++++
>> drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h | 4 +++
>> 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
>> index 0909e0bae9ec..ab38805055a4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>> #include <soc/tegra/ahb.h>
>> #include <soc/tegra/mc.h>
>>
>> +struct tegra_smmu_as;
>> +
>> struct tegra_smmu {
>> void __iomem *regs;
>> struct device *dev;
>> @@ -25,9 +27,10 @@ struct tegra_smmu {
>> const struct tegra_smmu_soc *soc;
>>
>> unsigned long *asids;
>> + struct tegra_smmu_as **as;
>> struct mutex lock;
>>
>> - struct list_head list;
>> + struct list_head swgroup_asid_list;
>> };
>>
>> struct tegra_smmu_as {
>> @@ -40,6 +43,12 @@ struct tegra_smmu_as {
>> u32 attr;
>> };
>>
>> +struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid {
>> + struct list_head list;
>> + unsigned swgroup_id;
>> + unsigned asid;
>> +};
>> +
>> static inline void smmu_writel(struct tegra_smmu *smmu, u32 value,
>> unsigned long offset)
>> {
>> @@ -376,6 +385,7 @@ static int tegra_smmu_as_prepare(struct tegra_smmu *smmu,
>> as->smmu = smmu;
>> as->use_count++;
>>
>> + smmu->as[as->id] = as;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -386,6 +396,7 @@ static void tegra_smmu_as_unprepare(struct tegra_smmu *smmu,
>> return;
>>
>> tegra_smmu_free_asid(smmu, as->id);
>> + smmu->as[as->id] = NULL;
>> as->smmu = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -398,6 +409,7 @@ static int tegra_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> struct of_phandle_args args;
>> unsigned int index = 0;
>> int err = 0;
>> + struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid *sa = NULL;
>
> This initialization is unneeded. Actually this declaration would
> probably be better placed in the while() loop below since its usage is
> local to it.
>
Correct.
>>
>> while (!of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", index,
>> &args)) {
>> @@ -411,6 +423,14 @@ static int tegra_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> return err;
>>
>> tegra_smmu_enable(smmu, swgroup, as->id);
>> +
>> + sa = kzalloc(sizeof(struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sa->list);
>
> You don't need to call INIT_LIST_HEAD on this, list_add_tail() will
> effectively overwrite any initialization done by this macro (see
> include/linux/list.h).
Right. So why we still need "INIT_LIST_HEAD"? Given most of the list
functions will manipulate "list->prev" & "list->next", I can't imagine a
scenario that we create a list while not calling list functions.
>
>> + sa->swgroup_id = swgroup;
>> + sa->asid = as->id;
>> + list_add_tail(&sa->list, &smmu->swgroup_asid_list);
>> +
>> index++;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -427,6 +447,7 @@ static void tegra_smmu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *de
>> struct tegra_smmu *smmu = as->smmu;
>> struct of_phandle_args args;
>> unsigned int index = 0;
>> + struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid *sa = NULL;
>
> Same here, move the declaration into the while() loop and remove the
> initialization.
>
OK.
>>
>> while (of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", index,
>> &args)) {
>> @@ -435,6 +456,13 @@ static void tegra_smmu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *de
>> if (args.np != smmu->dev->of_node)
>> continue;
>>
>> + list_for_each_entry(sa, &smmu->swgroup_asid_list, list) {
>> + if (sa->asid == as->id && sa->swgroup_id == swgroup)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + list_del(&sa->list);
>> + kfree(sa);
>> +
>> tegra_smmu_disable(smmu, swgroup, as->id);
>> tegra_smmu_as_unprepare(smmu, as);
>> index++;
>> @@ -651,6 +679,48 @@ static void tegra_smmu_ahb_enable(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +void tegra_smmu_resume(struct tegra_smmu *smmu)
>> +{
>> + struct tegra_smmu_as *as = NULL;
>> + unsigned int bit;
>> + u32 value;
>> + struct tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid *sa = NULL;
>
> Again no need to initialize to NULL here.
>
Yep. But it doesn't hurt, right? I don't know why the kernel developers
don't set NULL to pointers while relying on the compiler to do that.
Alex, do you know that?
>> +
>> + for_each_set_bit(bit, smmu->asids, smmu->soc->num_asids) {
>> + as = smmu->as[bit];
>> + smmu->soc->ops->flush_dcache(as->pd, 0, SMMU_SIZE_PD);
>> +
>> + smmu_writel(smmu, as->id & 0x7f, SMMU_PTB_ASID);
>> + value = SMMU_PTB_DATA_VALUE(as->pd, as->attr);
>> + smmu_writel(smmu, value, SMMU_PTB_DATA);
>> + }
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(sa, &smmu->swgroup_asid_list, list)
>> + tegra_smmu_enable(smmu, sa->swgroup_id, sa->asid);
>
> Actually I wonder if you could not do completely without the list
> here. How about the following:
>
> 1) add a "unsigned swgroup_id" member to tegra_smmu_as, set it in
> tegra_smmu_attach_dev() instead of sa->asid
> 2) in the "for_each_bit" loop above, call tegra_smmu_enable(smmu,
> as->swgroup_id, as->id) after the last smmu_writel()
>
> Would that work? It would allow you to get rid of the
> tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid struct as well as a few memory allocations. I
> don't know if that kind of 1:1 matching between as and and swgroup
> makes sense for the SMMU though, maybe Thierry or Hiroshi can confirm?
>
It wouldn't work, yes, you already mentioned, swgroup & asid is not 1:1
matching. Multiple swgroup can belong to 1 asid, swgroup/asid is N:1
matching.
So we need to create a list in "tegra_smmu_as" to save swgroup ids, if
we wanna remove "tegra_smmu_swgroup_asid".
BTW, Olof mentioned that we don't need to save/restore swgroup/asid
usage infos, just save/restore all necessary smmu registers blindly.
Given currently the smmu driver has defined all registers in the driver,
so I think that's another good way.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-23 7:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-08 6:20 [PATCH] memory: Add NVIDIA SMMU suspend/resume support Mark Zhang
2014-12-12 8:18 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-12-23 7:58 ` Mark Zhang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox