linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	rui.xiang@huawei.com, wengmeiling.weng@huawei.com
Subject: Re: sched: spinlock recursion in sched_rr_get_interval
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 02:01:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <549D07CD.8000204@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <549D03F6.9090607@huawei.com>

On 12/26/2014 01:45 AM, Li Bin wrote:
> On 2014/7/8 4:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:55:43AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> >> I've also had this one, which looks similar:
>>> >>
>>> >> [10375.005884] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, modprobe/10965
>>> >> [10375.006573]  lock: 0xffff8803a0fd7740, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: modprobe/10965, .owner_cpu: 15
>>> >> [10375.007412] CPU: 0 PID: 10965 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G        W      3.16.0-rc3-next-20140704-sasha-00023-g26c0906-dirty #765
>> > 
>> > Something's fucked; so we have:
>> > 
>> > debug_spin_lock_before()
>> > 	SPIN_BUG_ON(lock->owner == current, "recursion");
>> > 
> Hello,
> Does ACCESS_ONCE() can help this issue? I have no evidence that its lack is
> responsible for the issue, but I think here need it indeed. Is that right?
> 
> SPIN_BUG_ON(ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner) == current, "recursion");

Could you explain a bit more why do you think it's needed?


Thanks,
Sasha

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-26  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-06 17:27 sched: spinlock recursion in sched_rr_get_interval Sasha Levin
2014-07-07  8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 13:55   ` Sasha Levin
2014-07-07 20:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 22:47       ` Sasha Levin
2014-07-28 23:08         ` Sasha Levin
2014-09-17  9:13       ` Jovi Zhangwei
2014-12-26  6:45       ` Li Bin
2014-12-26  7:01         ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2014-12-27  9:02           ` Li Bin
2014-12-27  9:52         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-27 15:52           ` Sasha Levin
2014-12-28 20:17             ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-29 14:22               ` Sasha Levin
2014-12-30  1:04               ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=549D07CD.8000204@oracle.com \
    --to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rui.xiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wengmeiling.weng@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).