From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<lizefan@huawei.com>, <acme@kernel.org>, <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix building error in x86_64 when dwarf unwind is on
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 16:14:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A10D53.2010800@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141229075607.GC6081@sejong>
On 2014/12/29 15:56, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Wang,
>
> (Adding Arnaldo and Jiri to CC)
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 09:26:11AM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
>> When build with 'make ARCH=x86' and dwarf unwind is on, there is a
>> compiling error:
>>
>> CC /home/wn/perf/arch/x86/util/unwind-libdw.o
>> CC /home/wn/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.o
>> arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S: Assembler messages:
>> arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S:65: Error: operand type mismatch for `push'
>> arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S:72: Error: operand type mismatch for `pop'
>> make[1]: *** [/home/wn/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.o] Error 1
>> make[1]: INTERNAL: Exiting with 25 jobserver tokens available; should be 24!
>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>> ...
>>
>> Which is caused by incorrectly undefine macro HAVE_ARCH_X86_64_SUPPORT.
>> 'config/Makefile.arch' tests __x86_64__ only when 'ARCH=x86_64'. However,
>> with 'ARCH=x86', the underlying compile may also be x86_64, which causes
>> mismatching.
>
> Hmm.. how did you compile this? I guess ARCH=x86 requires -m32 flag
> to the gcc, did you pass it (like via EXTRA_CFLAGS=-m32)?
>
> I'm confused by 'underlying compile may also be x86_64' part..
>
I hit this problem when building perf with Yocto (https://www.yoctoproject.org/), which
is a famous building system for embeded system.
When building kernel, we can simply use 'make ARCH=x86' and select 'CONFIG_64BIT'
in menuconfig to get a x86_64 kernel. As a result, there building framework
like Yocto doesn't ever consider 'x86_64' as a valid ARCH option. See:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/classes/kernel-arch.bbclass
Therefore, when building with such framework, it uses a x86_64 compiler and ARCH=x86.
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
>>
>> This patch fixes it by checking __x86_64__ in both case of
>> 'ARCH=x86_64' and 'ARCH=x86'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch b/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
>> index 851cd01..303a096 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
>> +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
>> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ endif
>>
>> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
>> override ARCH := x86
>> +endif
>> +ifeq ($(ARCH),x86)
>> IS_X86_64 := 0
>> ifeq (, $(findstring m32,$(CFLAGS)))
>> IS_X86_64 := $(shell echo __x86_64__ | ${CC} -E -x c - | tail -n 1)
>> --
>> 1.8.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-29 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-27 1:26 [PATCH] perf: fix building error in x86_64 when dwarf unwind is on Wang Nan
2014-12-29 7:56 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-12-29 8:14 ` Wang Nan [this message]
2015-01-07 2:53 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-07 5:40 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-07 8:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-07 12:28 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-07 13:50 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-08 1:30 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-08 5:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-09 14:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-12 2:20 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-12 3:28 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-12 10:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-17 10:10 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf tools: Fix " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-03 19:58 [PATCH] perf: fix " Christopher Covington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54A10D53.2010800@huawei.com \
--to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).