linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<lizefan@huawei.com>, <acme@kernel.org>, <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix building error in x86_64 when dwarf unwind is on
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 16:14:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A10D53.2010800@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141229075607.GC6081@sejong>

On 2014/12/29 15:56, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Wang,
> 
> (Adding Arnaldo and Jiri to CC)
> 
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 09:26:11AM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
>> When build with 'make ARCH=x86' and dwarf unwind is on, there is a
>> compiling error:
>>
>>    CC       /home/wn/perf/arch/x86/util/unwind-libdw.o
>>    CC       /home/wn/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.o
>>  arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S: Assembler messages:
>>  arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S:65: Error: operand type mismatch for `push'
>>  arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S:72: Error: operand type mismatch for `pop'
>>  make[1]: *** [/home/wn/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.o] Error 1
>>  make[1]: INTERNAL: Exiting with 25 jobserver tokens available; should be 24!
>>  make: *** [all] Error 2
>>  ...
>>
>> Which is caused by incorrectly undefine macro HAVE_ARCH_X86_64_SUPPORT.
>> 'config/Makefile.arch' tests __x86_64__ only when 'ARCH=x86_64'. However,
>> with 'ARCH=x86', the underlying compile may also be x86_64, which causes
>> mismatching.
> 
> Hmm.. how did you compile this?  I guess ARCH=x86 requires -m32 flag
> to the gcc, did you pass it (like via EXTRA_CFLAGS=-m32)?
> 
> I'm confused by 'underlying compile may also be x86_64' part..
> 

I hit this problem when building perf with Yocto (https://www.yoctoproject.org/), which
is a famous building system for embeded system.

When building kernel, we can simply use 'make ARCH=x86' and select 'CONFIG_64BIT'
in menuconfig to get a x86_64 kernel. As a result, there building framework
like Yocto doesn't ever consider 'x86_64' as a valid ARCH option. See:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/classes/kernel-arch.bbclass
Therefore, when building with such framework, it uses a x86_64 compiler and ARCH=x86.

> Thanks,
> Namhyung
> 
> 
>>
>> This patch fixes it by checking __x86_64__ in both case of
>> 'ARCH=x86_64' and 'ARCH=x86'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch b/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
>> index 851cd01..303a096 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
>> +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
>> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ endif
>>  
>>  ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
>>    override ARCH := x86
>> +endif
>> +ifeq ($(ARCH),x86)
>>    IS_X86_64 := 0
>>    ifeq (, $(findstring m32,$(CFLAGS)))
>>      IS_X86_64 := $(shell echo __x86_64__ | ${CC} -E -x c - | tail -n 1)
>> -- 
>> 1.8.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-29  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-27  1:26 [PATCH] perf: fix building error in x86_64 when dwarf unwind is on Wang Nan
2014-12-29  7:56 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-12-29  8:14   ` Wang Nan [this message]
2015-01-07  2:53     ` Wang Nan
2015-01-07  5:40       ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-07  8:39         ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-07 12:28           ` Wang Nan
2015-01-07 13:50             ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-08  1:30               ` Wang Nan
2015-01-08  5:09                 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-09 14:43                   ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-12  2:20                     ` Wang Nan
2015-01-12  3:28                       ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-12 10:36                         ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-17 10:10                       ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf tools: Fix " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-03 19:58 [PATCH] perf: fix " Christopher Covington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54A10D53.2010800@huawei.com \
    --to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).