From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Christophe Fillot <cf@utc.fr>
Cc: linux-ima-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-ima-user] Initramfs and IMA Appraisal
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:34:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A1BAEE.6000101@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1419860736.14143.13.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com>
On 12/29/2014 07:45 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 10:15 +0100, Christophe Fillot wrote:
>>>
>>> Are you using an initrd not an initramfs? According to
>>> Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.txt, "If
>> CONFIG_TMPFS
>>> is enabled, rootfs will use tmpfs instead of ramfs by default".
>>>
>> Yes, that what I thought too, but it seems that it is not really the
>> case because of this test:
>>
>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TMPFS) && !saved_root_name[0] &&
>> (!root_fs_names || strstr(root_fs_names, "tmpfs"))) {
>> err = shmem_init();
>> is_tmpfs = true;
>> } else {
>> err = init_ramfs_fs();
>> }
>
> [CC'ing Rob Landley, lsm, lkml]
>
> Thanks! "saved_root_name" is set to the boot command line "root="
> option, which in my case is the UUID. I'm not sure why real root should
> impact the initramfs tmpfs/ramfs decision.
>
> Unless there is a good explanation, did you want to post a patch to
> remove the test?
I added support last year, here's the start of the patch series:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/29/101
The logic is that if you specify a fallback root via root=, then you're
not staying on rootfs (that's what root= _means_, "here is the root
filesystem the kernel is to mount over rootfs"), and thus the extra
infrastructure for tmpfs instead of ramfs is unnecessary.
I keep encountering people who set root=/dev/ram0 because they think
that means initrd (it doesn't), and then they feed in a cpio archive
(that's a third state even before you get to the ramfs/tmpfs
distinction), and they always want to change the code to make what they
asked it to do not be crazy...
Possibly the documentation needs to elaborate, but I expect what we
really need is a CONFIG_VERBOSE_ROOT_SETUP that sticks in a bunch of
printfs so the /dev/console output explains what it's doing. ("could not
exec /init out of initramfs (errno %d, file %s), falling back to
root=\nAdd blather=1 to kernel cmdline to see cpio
filenames/permissions.", and so on. Where "actual exec" shows where your
dynamic linker is when that's what wasn't there.)
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-29 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5463ABC8.10308@utc.fr>
[not found] ` <1415827252.18773.33.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <547617AF.6000604@utc.fr>
[not found] ` <1417039941.26016.46.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <5476EBAC.8090103@utc.fr>
2014-12-29 13:45 ` [Linux-ima-user] Initramfs and IMA Appraisal Mimi Zohar
2014-12-29 20:34 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2014-12-29 21:46 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-12-30 1:55 ` Rob Landley
2014-12-30 3:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-12-30 4:17 ` Rob Landley
2014-12-30 2:25 ` David Lang
2014-12-30 3:06 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54A1BAEE.6000101@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=cf@utc.fr \
--cc=linux-ima-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox