From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756125AbbAFWav (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:30:51 -0500 Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]:52539 "EHLO mail1.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751754AbbAFWau convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:30:50 -0500 Message-ID: <54AC6207.5000407@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:30:31 -0600 From: Jason Wessel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton , Joe Perches CC: Daniel Thompson , lkml , "kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net" , Ingo Molnar , John Stultz , Sumit Semwal , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: kgdb-next not pushed to Linus for 3.19 References: <54AC2F5D.9050405@linaro.org> <1420570662.2652.36.camel@perches.com> <20150106132102.65ad5988fc566357450e3d65@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20150106132102.65ad5988fc566357450e3d65@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/06/2015 03:21 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:57:42 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 18:54 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote: >>> Hi Jason >>> >>> I'm trying to figure out what to do with my long-outstanding kgdb/kdb >>> patches in preparation for the 3.20 merge window. >>> >>> As of now I have five pending patch sets some of which are well over six >>> months old (and none have nay outstanding review comments). >>> >>> When I raised this with you a couple of months ago, two of the patch >>> sets did land in your kgdb-next tree. However nothing seems to have >>> happened since then and I couldn't find any messages from you during the >>> 3.19 merge window. >>> >>> I'm afraid I don't know what else I need to do to progress things. >>> >>> I do plan to do routine rebasing and resending of my patchsets but, >>> based on the past experience, that seems unlikely to be enough to get >>> the code delivered in 3.20. >>> >>> Do you think I would be better sending these patches via someone else? >>> In any case, advice would be very welcome. >> Andrew? >> >> I think Daniel's kgdb patches are bug fixes. >> >> Can you please pick them up? > yup. Merging patches which are already in -next is a bit of a pain, > but I'll cope. > > Daniel, can you please resend everything in a nice clean coherent > stream? > I did not mean to miss the merge window, but I ended up being out the majority of December -> yesterday. Now that I am back, I don't think you have to burden Andrew here. I'll send a pull request for what is in kgdb-next since it is cleanups and fixes, and regression test anything else Daniel has left. Cheers, Jason.