From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753359AbbAGNxq (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:53:46 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:42197 "EHLO mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752378AbbAGNxo (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:53:44 -0500 Message-ID: <54AD3A68.1010602@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 13:53:44 +0000 From: Daniel Thompson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Wessel , Andrew Morton , Joe Perches CC: lkml , "kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net" , Ingo Molnar , John Stultz , Sumit Semwal , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: kgdb-next not pushed to Linus for 3.19 References: <54AC2F5D.9050405@linaro.org> <1420570662.2652.36.camel@perches.com> <20150106132102.65ad5988fc566357450e3d65@linux-foundation.org> <54AC6207.5000407@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <54AC6207.5000407@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/01/15 22:30, Jason Wessel wrote: > On 01/06/2015 03:21 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:57:42 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 18:54 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote: >>>> Hi Jason >>>> >>>> I'm trying to figure out what to do with my long-outstanding kgdb/kdb >>>> patches in preparation for the 3.20 merge window. >>>> >>>> As of now I have five pending patch sets some of which are well over six >>>> months old (and none have nay outstanding review comments). >>>> >>>> When I raised this with you a couple of months ago, two of the patch >>>> sets did land in your kgdb-next tree. However nothing seems to have >>>> happened since then and I couldn't find any messages from you during the >>>> 3.19 merge window. >>>> >>>> I'm afraid I don't know what else I need to do to progress things. >>>> >>>> I do plan to do routine rebasing and resending of my patchsets but, >>>> based on the past experience, that seems unlikely to be enough to get >>>> the code delivered in 3.20. >>>> >>>> Do you think I would be better sending these patches via someone else? >>>> In any case, advice would be very welcome. >>> Andrew? >>> >>> I think Daniel's kgdb patches are bug fixes. >>> >>> Can you please pick them up? >> yup. Merging patches which are already in -next is a bit of a pain, >> but I'll cope. >> >> Daniel, can you please resend everything in a nice clean coherent >> stream? >> > > I did not mean to miss the merge window, but I ended up being out > the majority of December -> yesterday. > > Now that I am back, I don't think you have to burden Andrew here. > I'll send a pull request for what is in kgdb-next since it is cleanups > and fixes, and regression test anything else Daniel has left. Ok. I'm working on the rebase-and-resends now. Thanks.