linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"tixy@linaro.org" <tixy@linaro.org>,
	"ananth@in.ibm.com" <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	"sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org" <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com"
	<masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	"wcohen@redhat.com" <wcohen@redhat.com>,
	"oleg@redhat.com" <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] ARM64: Move BRK opcodes defines from kprobes.h to insn.h
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 23:01:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AEBEE0.8030100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150108165506.GP11583@arm.com>



On Thursday 08 January 2015 10:25 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 03:21:17PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>> Its better to keep all BRK opcodes used by kprobes and uprobes at one
>> place. Therefore move these defines to asm/insn.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 6 ++++++
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.h   | 7 +------
>>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
>> index e2ff32a93b5c..87fa48746806 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
>> @@ -23,6 +23,12 @@
>>   /* A64 instructions are always 32 bits. */
>>   #define	AARCH64_INSN_SIZE		4
>>
>> +/* BRK opcodes with ESR encoding  */
>> +#define BRK64_ESR_MASK		0xFFFF
>> +#define BRK64_ESR_KPROBES	0x0004
>> +#define BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES	0xD4200080	/* "brk 0x4" */
>
> These might be better off in debug-monitors.h, but I guess that's for the
> kprobes series to sort out.
>

Agreed.

~Pratyush
>> +#define ARCH64_NOP_OPCODE	0xD503201F
>
> We have aarch64_insn_gen_nop for this.
>
> Will
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-08 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-31 15:21 [RFC 0/8] ARM64: Uprobe support added Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 1/8] ARM64: Move BRK opcodes defines from kprobes.h to insn.h Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 16:55   ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:31     ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 2/8] ARM64: Refactor kprobes-arm64 Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 16:55   ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:33     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 17:36       ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:39         ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 3/8] Kernel/uprobe: Define arch_uprobe_exception_notify as __weak Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 17:43   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:50     ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 4/8] ARM64: Add instruction_pointer_set function Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 16:59   ` Will Deacon
2015-01-09  5:18     ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 5/8] ARM64: Re-factor flush_ptrace_access Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 17:51   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-02 18:19     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:50       ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 6/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_HWBRKPT for user mode as well Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 18:05   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-08 17:01     ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:51       ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 7/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_BRKPT " Pratyush Anand
2014-12-31 15:21 ` [RFC 8/8] ARM64: Add uprobe support Pratyush Anand
2015-01-02 17:23   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:49     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-04 18:40       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-05  4:17         ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 17:03   ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:54     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-09 17:45       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12  4:50         ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-09 17:59   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12  5:04     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-12  6:45       ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-12 14:38         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 14:28       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-01  1:59 ` [RFC 0/8] ARM64: Uprobe support added Pratyush Anand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54AEBEE0.8030100@redhat.com \
    --to=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org \
    --cc=tixy@linaro.org \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).