From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] genirq: Make irqchip flags work with stacked irq domains
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:07:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AF45E0.2080803@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420738365-22063-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On 2015/1/9 1:32, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> With the landing of stacked irq domains in 3.19, we have ended up in a
> situation where we have a stack of IRQ controllers, each with their
> set of flags, but the core code is only able to look at the top-most,
> which is not very helpful. This small series is trying to fix this.
>
> The first patch converts all access to desc->irq_data.chip->flags to
> using an accessor, without changing anything else. The second patch
> adds some logic to combine these flags as we allocate the interrupts,
> ultimately storing the resulting set as part of the irq_desc
> structure.
>
> We end-up with a configuration where the flags can either be located
> in the irq_chip structure (non stacked case), or in the irq_desc
> (stacked case). While this isn't really ideal, this gives at least the
> right level of information to the rest of the IRQ framework.
Hi Mark,
By this way, we need to aggregate irq_chip flags for every
irq. How about changing irq_desc_get_chip_flags(struct irq_desc *desc)
to irq_desc_check_chip_flags(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int flags)
which dynamically walks the stacked irqchips?
Thanks!
Gerry
>
> Based on 3.19-rc3, and available at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git irq/stacked-irqchip-flags
>
> Marc Zyngier (2):
> genirq: Abstract access to irq_chip flags
> genirq: Allow irq_desc to carry the union of stacked irq_chip flags
>
> include/linux/irq.h | 4 ++++
> include/linux/irqdesc.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> kernel/irq/chip.c | 10 +++++-----
> kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 3 +++
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 +++---
> kernel/irq/pm.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 17:32 [PATCH 0/2] genirq: Make irqchip flags work with stacked irq domains Marc Zyngier
2015-01-08 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] genirq: Abstract access to irq_chip flags Marc Zyngier
2015-01-09 3:00 ` Jiang Liu
2015-01-09 9:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-08 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] genirq: Allow irq_desc to carry the union of stacked " Marc Zyngier
2015-01-09 3:07 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2015-01-09 9:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] genirq: Make irqchip flags work with stacked irq domains Marc Zyngier
2015-01-13 10:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-13 10:49 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AF45E0.2080803@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox